Letter
to Jude’s from Simons Dad
Letter
to my Solicitors
|
8/8/25, 7:14 AM (9,697
unread) – re_wired@ymail.com – Yahoo Mail Subject: Introduction and
Submission of Documents
From: Rewired Rewired
(re_wired@ymail.com) To: tuckers@tuckerssolicitors.com Date: Thursday 7 August 2025 at 19:59 BST
Dear Dina, I hope this message finds you
well. My name is Simon Paul Cordell, and I'm writing to introduce myself and
express my gratitude for your services. Attached to this email, you will
find my MG11 form, along with important documents including a letter of
consent for my upcoming holiday, a letter regarding a change of bowel for my
father, and a letter of instructions. Please let me know if there is
anything else you require from me at this time. Thank you once again for your
assistance. Best regards, Simon Paul Cordell These files are complete but are still having minor
amendments but feel free to serve them as they are! Weblink: nova1.ddns.net/Si1/ If pdf's
are required i am happy to provide them Ready for
court Tomorrow. Thanks again Mr. Simon Paul Cordell. |
|
|
|
WITNESS STATEMENT Criminal Procedure
Rules, r 16.2; Criminal Justice Act 1967, s. 9 The Civil Procedure
Rules 1998 URN Statement of: Mr. Simon
Paul Cordell Age if under
18: (if over 18 inserts ‘over 18’) Occupation: News Reporter! |
|
This statement (consisting of [00] page(s) each
signed by me) is true to the best of my knowledge and belief and I make it
knowing that, if it is tendered in evidence, I shall be liable to prosecution
if I have willfully stated in it anything which I know to be false, or do not
believe to be true. Signature:
(witness)
Date: I, Mr Simon Paul Cordell, of
109 Burncroft Avenue PO BOX EN3 7JQ. I WILL SAY AS FOLLOWS MG11 Statement – Simon Cordell Date of Incident: 03/07/2025 Background I am a secure tenant living on the ground
floor of Address: 109 Burncroft Avenue Enfield En3
7jq. Since 2006. One of my neighbours, Rebecca O’Hare
who I believe is illegally subletting a council flat on the second floor
since late 2017 or early 2018, has made false allegations to the police
claiming I harassed her. This is entirely untrue. I have never knocked on her door or initiated
contact. Since she moved in, she has persistently targeted me with behaviour
that is malicious, distressing, and harmful. I have multiple exhibits of
evidence proving she is the aggressor. These are documented on my website
Horrificcorruption.com, and I am currently pursuing legal action against
council and police staff who have enabled this mistreatment. Rebecca is aware of my documentation and uses
this knowledge to try and discredit me before I release the full truth. Her
actions are part of a broader attempt to suppress evidence of corruption and
abuse. Events Leading Up to the Incident On 28/06/2025, I underwent hernia surgery at
North Circular Private Hospital. The recovery left me bedridden, unable to
bend, walk properly, or sleep comfortably. On 02/07/2025, I contacted the
hospital due to concerns about swelling and pain. They advised me to wait a
few more days and monitor the symptoms. On 03/07/2025, around 6pm, I became hungry
and ordered approximately £45 worth of Indian food via Just Eat. I timed my
exit to the communal hallway precisely when the delivery driver arrived, as I
avoid lingering there due to Rebecca’s history of harassment. I do not stand
in my own corridor out of fear—she has banged on the kitchen wall, used her
flat to negatively affect my home and belongings, and violated my right to a
private life. While watching the delivery driver arrive, I
saw Rebecca drive past in a grey 2025 car with no L plates. I had never seen
her drive before and do not believe she owns the vehicle or holds a valid UK
driving licence. I reported this to the police, but they showed no interest. I have exhibited prove with mutable other witness
of mine who are all happy to attend court to give evidence to this effect
about her. The police or council refuse to investigate or arrest Rebbeca and
leave her to continue her evil crimes against me. I have reported this to the
council due to the safety of her looking after her own children that she gave
birth to since she moved into the block of flats I rent in, and this is due
to her own bad decisions. On this day 03/07/25 I had been in doors after my
operation at North Circular Private Hospital. I had been for a hernia
operation on the 28/06/2025, this operation left me bedridden and unable to
bend over and pick things up, stand up straight, laydown comfortably, walk,
couth, talk, sleep, without serios pain, in fact I believed the operations
had gone wrong. Interaction with Delivery Driver The driver handed me the food, but the bag
felt light. I ran back out and called him to return. We spoke while he tried
to reach his office to resolve the missing items. During this time, I saw
Rebecca enter the car park and interact with another neighbour who waved at
her. That neighbour then walked past me, greeted me, and witnessed Rebecca
re-enter the building and walk past me without any verbal exchange. I did not speak to her or acknowledge her. I
simply documented the event in my diary, as I always do. She knows I record everything,
and this is why she is trying to set me up—before I release the full
evidence. Eventually, the delivery driver confirmed the
till receipt had not printed the full order. He returned with the missing
items and additional food, bringing the total value to around £60. I went
back inside, while still in my pyjamas, and began dishing up the food. The car park is 400-500 yards away and I can’t
access it from my front block without taking a 3–4-minute walk. As she walked
past me, she was giving me dirty looks, but I just refused to acknowledge
her. Eventually, the delivery driver got through to his boss and found out
that the till receipt hadn't printed the complete order. I had paid £24 and
received a 20% discount, plus I had an £8 token, so I was expecting £45 worth
of Indian food. I was happy, but I didn’t receive it all. The driver then
went back and returned with the missing items and even more, making it worth
£60 in total. I finally got back inside and started to dish it up, which was
about an hour and a half after I saw Rebecca last. Police Arrival –
Full Account Approximately 90 minutes after I had returned
inside and begun eating my meal, I heard aggressive banging at my front door.
Due to the force used, I approached with caution and asked who it was. A
female voice—who I now know to be a police officer—shouted, “Open the door
now.” I asked her to identify herself and explain the reason for her
presence. She replied, “It’s the police, open the door now.” I stated clearly that I had done nothing wrong
and asked what this was about. She claimed I had been “harassing my
neighbours.” I responded with the following facts:
The officer appeared agitated and instructed a
male colleague to retrieve a battering ram to break down my door. As he
rushed off, I tried to explain that I was behind the door and was attempting
to slide my medical note under it. I had recently undergone hernia surgery
and was still in pyjamas, unable to move quickly. I held the medical note in my hand and pleaded
with them not to break the door, explaining the risks involved. Despite this,
the male officer smashed the door open with the ram, striking me in the head.
I stumbled back but managed to stay upright, still holding the medical note
in both hands, raised in the air. Seeing me unarmed and in clear distress, the male
officer threw the ram to the floor, then abruptly pulled out his stun gun and
aimed it directly at my face. I saw the red targeting light in my line of
sight and feared for my life. I pleaded with him to calm down, saying:
Instead of de-escalating, it seemed as if he
discharged the stun gun in all his rage and then used it as a blunt weapon,
striking me across the head. His female colleague, who had initiated the
entire incident, assisted him and ignored my screams of pain and concern. She
grabbed the medical note from my hand, threw it to the floor, and shouted,
“You’re not getting an ambulance,” as I pleaded for one. She then wrapped restraints around my legs,
causing severe pain to my stitches and surgical site. Together, they threw me
to the floor like a rag doll, showing no regard for my head or the risk of
further injury. At one point, the male officer deliberately punched me in the
stomach—directly where I had been operated on—causing me to scream in agony
and again beg for an ambulance. They refused repeatedly. Eventually, other officers arrived and entered my
flat. They witnessed the assault firsthand, with their own eyes and body
cameras. They heard me pleading for medical help and saw the brutality. These
new officers intervened, told the original two to leave my flat, and took
over. They treated me like a human being, listened to
my requests, and agreed to remove the leg restraints. They allowed me to
secure my flat and walked me outside. I believed I was being taken to an
ambulance—but instead, they said no ambulance was coming and that I was going
in a police van. I sat down outside the flats, knowing their
actions would worsen my medical condition. Neighbours began to gather,
including the gentleman who had waved earlier. I pleaded with the female
officer to reconsider and release me, but she refused and repeated, “You’re
not getting an ambulance.” Multiple neighbours offered to make statements,
saying I had done nothing wrong and that Rebecca was the one causing problem.
They told police they were lying and insisted an ambulance had been called
and would arrive in five minutes. The police, realizing they were in trouble,
had no choice but to wait. I explained again that this was a civil matter. I
had not left the flats, and there was no immediate danger. The proper course
of action would have been to give Rebecca a diary, advise her to contact the
council, and issue me a warning. If I breached it, then arrest me. But none
of that happened. Instead, I was arrested for harassment under the
1997 Act. I shocked the officer by quoting the Act and its requirements,
which were clearly not met. 🚑 Hospitalisation and Custody
Timeline Eventually, the police were forced to call an
ambulance, but said it refused to attend for me, but my neighbours called one
and said it will be here in 5 minutes. I was taken to hospital and kept there
for 24 hours due to the severity of my injuries. I Exhibit the Response from the hospital as Exhibit:
111 “Under arrest please present - Had argument with
his neighbours this evening police called - put to the ground by police at
time felt “pop” sensation to stitches. Had surgery done 2 days ago for hernia
repair see oh testicular pain Worse to R side since assault PMH ASTHMA hernia
repair psychosis LAS OBS!” Even the doctors reported this as an “Assault!” I arrived at the police station around 6:00 AM
the following morning. I was officially booked in at approximately 8:00 AM. I
was told that my custody time would start from that point, meaning they had
24 hours from then to either release me or call a custody inspector to extend
my detention. I had been arrested under the Protection from
Harassment Act 1997, and after speaking to doctors and explaining what
had happened, I was deemed fit for interview. I still required an appropriate
adult to be present. During the interview, the officer began asking
questions unrelated to the arrest—specifically about alleged harassment of
police officers. My solicitor immediately intervened, stating that the
officer had no legal right to ask those questions, as I had not been arrested
for that. He was correct. ⏱ Midnight to Morning – Illegal Detention At midnight, an inspector came to my cell and spoke to me through the
flap. I told him about the fraudulent entries in my PNC record and explained
how they had been manipulated by court and police review teams. He said, “If
what you’re saying is true, then that must be true,” but added that he
couldn’t help me. He told me I would be released “in a
minute”—likely between 2:00 and 3:00 AM. But no one released me at that time.
By 4:00 AM, I realised I was being held illegally. The officers on duty were
clearly waiting for the next shift at 7:00 AM to release me, rather than
doing it themselves. This meant they were knowingly holding me for an
extra 8 hours without legal justification. I understood that this delay would
prevent them from re-bailing or re-interviewing me, as the custody clock
would expire. They would have no choice but to take no further action
on the case. I confronted the officers, saying, “You’re
holding me illegally under this CAD number from 12 to 8, knowing there’s no
case to answer and you’re going to drop the charge.” They realised I was
right and became visibly concerned. They knew they weren’t conducting any
investigation—because the incident had occurred two days earlier, and their
notebooks and evidence had already been collected. 📞 Denial of Contact and Legal Rights I repeatedly used the buzzer in my cell, asking to speak to my mother
and aunt—both of whom were my appropriate adults. The police refused, saying
it was “too late” and that they were sleeping. I pleaded with them,
explaining that my family had instructed me to call them and were expecting
to pick me up. My aunt later confirmed she had called the
station multiple times but was told she wasn’t allowed to attend. They said
they would call her when I was ready—but they never did. Around 4:00 AM, officers came to my cell and took
me to the custody desk. Without re-arresting me or conducting a new
interview, they dropped the original harassment charge. But instead of
releasing me, they fabricated a second charge—claiming I had
threatened to blow up a car. I had not been interviewed about this new
allegation. My solicitor had already been sent home after the first interview
(around 7–8 PM), and when I requested, he be called back, I was told he was
“sleeping” or “not picking up.” No duty solicitor was provided as a
replacement. I was denied my appropriate adult again. Instead,
the custody officer put me on the phone with someone they had chosen to act
as my adult. I objected, saying, “This is wrong—you must call my family.” My
request was refused. I was formally charged with the new offence,
despite explaining clearly that it was baseless and that I had been denied my
legal rights. I was returned to my cell and locked in. 📢 Speaking Out and Exposing Fraud This deeply upset me. I began speaking aloud, explaining everything I
knew to be true including the fraud in my PNC record, where conviction
entries had been manipulated by court and police review teams. I knew the
entire station could hear me, but I couldn’t be sure what they were doing
about it. I gave detailed instructions on how to verify the
records using their own systems and my website. I remembered most of the data
by heart and recited it clearly. I gave them detailed instructions on how to check
the records on their computers and my website as I remember most of it now of
by heart. 🚔 Transfer to Court and Criminal Record Revelation Later that morning, police officers came to my
cell and informed me I was being taken to court. I was escorted to the
custody desk, where I saw a G3 jailer preparing to place me in a van. He was
holding handcuffs, ready to restrain me. I refused to go with him and instead approached
the custody officer directly. I stated clearly, “I’m not leaving the
station.” In response, the custody officer proposed a deal. He said, “If you
get on the van and leave my station without causing any problems, I’ll show
you the results of the internal checks I’ve done on your criminal record.” I asked what he meant. He explained that he had
heard everything I’d been saying about the fabricated entries in my PNC record
and had conducted internal checks to verify my claims. I agreed to the deal. He turned his computer screen toward me and
showed me my criminal record. He confirmed that I was right: the entries had
been fraudulently created. He pointed out that the courts were closed on the
dates listed for convictions 41, 42, and others I had previously exposed. He
acknowledged that I was correct about all entries prior to my first reprimand
warning and confirmed that the ones my mother had identified—and that Highbury
& Islington Courts had agreed were missing from their registry—were
indeed not legitimate. He then kindly asked me to leave the station. I was placed in the van and transported to court.
The custody officer clearly knew that the refusal of bail had been
based on errors. I had never been arrested in relation to the alleged victim
before, and I had not been found guilty of any offence in over 25 years. |
|
Signature: Signature witnessed by: |
|
|
|
RESTRICTED (when complete) |
||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Witness contact details URN |
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Name
of witness: Home Address: Postcode: E-mail address: Mobile: Home Telephone Number: Work Telephone
Number: Preferred means of contact (specify
details for vulnerable/intimidated victims and witnesses only): Gender: Date and place of birth: Former name: Ethnicity
Code (16 + 1): DATES OF WITNESS NON-AVAILABILITY: Witness
care
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Witness Consent (for witness completion) The Victim Personal Statement scheme (victims only) has
been explained to me Yes No I have been given the Victim Personal Statement Leaflet Yes No I have been given the leaflet “Giving a witness statement
to the police…” Yes No I consent to police having access to my medical record(s)
in relation Yes, No N/A to this matter (obtained in accordance with local
practice) I consent to my medical record in relation to this matter
being Yes, No N/A disclosed to the defence. I consent to the statement being disclosed for the purposes
of civil, yes, No N/A or other proceedings if
applicable, e.g., childcare proceedings, CICA Child witness cases only. I have had the provision
regarding Yes, No N/A reporting restrictions explained
to me. I would like CPS to apply for reporting restrictions on my
behalf. Yes, No N/A ‘I understand that the information recorded above will be
passed on to the Witness Service, which offers help and support to witnesses
pre-trial and at court.’ Signature of witness: PRINT NAME: Signature
of parent/guardian/appropriate adult: PRINT NAME: Address and telephone number (of
parent etc.), if different from above: |
||||||||||||||||
|
Statement taken
by: Station: Time and place statement
taken: |
||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||
Dear Judge’s
I respectfully request
consideration for permission to travel to Turkey to complete my dental surgery.
The procedure, already in progress, was scheduled and partially paid for prior
to my detainment, with significant expenses incurred totalling £1,600. Given
the circumstances and my confidence in a favourable outcome, I assure you my
request is in no way an attempt to evade justice. It would be deeply
distressing to face further delays in my necessary treatment due to these legal
proceedings. I’m committed to complying with all court directives and would
return promptly for any required proceedings. I humbly seek your understanding
and approval for this request.
Respectfully, Mr. Simon Paul
Cordell
Subject: Urgent Request for Legal
Support and Disclosure of Evidence
To: tuckers@tuckerssolicitors.com
From: Simon Paul Cordell Date: [Insert Date]
Dear Tuckers Solicitors,
I hope this message finds you well. I am writing to
formally request your legal assistance regarding a recent incident that I
believe constitutes a serious breach of my human and legal rights.
I am seeking your support in obtaining the following
materials related to my case:
- Body-worn
camera footage from the officers involved
- All
relevant police statements and incident reports
- Any
available CCTV or video evidence from the time of arrest and detainment
- All
Missing statements to be recovered that the police officers refused to
take.
I am prepared to provide a comprehensive witness statement
and supporting documentation, including medical records and legal exhibits. I
also have the badge number of the officer in charge—PC3454NA (RYAW)—and two
corroborating witness statements confirming misconduct.
In brief, the situation involves an unlawful entry,
excessive force during arrest (including the use of a stun gun while I was
holding a medical note), and detainment without legitimate cause. The initial
charges were dropped, yet a new charge was introduced without any further
arrest or interview. This sequence of events appears to be an attempt to
retroactively justify an unjust detainment.
I am deeply concerned about:
- The
misuse of power and breach of PACE guidelines
- Denial
of medical attention during custody
- Imposition
of bail conditions without proper arrest
- Mishandling
of personal information and procedural irregularities
These actions violate my rights under the Human Rights Act,
including the right to liberty, security, and a fair trial. I urgently request
your guidance on how to challenge the bail conditions and initiate a formal
complaint or legal action against the officers and authorities involved.
I am willing to meet at your earliest convenience to
discuss this matter further. Please advise on any additional disclosures or
steps I should take to ensure full transparency and accountability.
Thank you for your attention and expertise in handling this
sensitive issue.
Sincerely, Simon Paul Cordell 109 Burncroft Avenue
PO BOX EN3 7JQ [Phone Number] [Email Address]
My website: Horrific
Corruption: Uncovering the Dark Truth's
Holder for N1 Claim Form