01/02/2014

Stuck on bail at my Own Home Address again for the Woolwich Crown Court Case!

Building the catalogue with Josh!

Issues with Housing Disrepair!

Working on My Website!

With Partner Two!

01/02/2014

New Month

· Disrepair!

· 1st Curfew!

Disrepair!

I continue to stay overwhelmed by the circumstances that I get made to live in by the Enfield Council and the Enfield Homes departments!

Time Spent Building;

In the background of everything going on I continued working on Creating a new and up to date event Contingency Plan and I continued to Study and finish at the Time Start: 07:00 Am and Time End: 03:30 Pm!

My mother also continues to work on building my company website for me with others at the Time Start: 09:00 and Time End: 14:00!

Working at Home doing Court Case Defence Work!

I spent time and resources costing expenditure with my mother also building my defence case, against the allegations getting put against me at the Time Start: 12:00 Am and Time End: 06:00 Am!

02/02/2014

Stuck on bail at my Own Home Address again for the Woolwich Crown Court Case!

Building the catalogue with Josh!

Issues with Housing Disrepair!

Working on My Website!

With Partner Two!

02/02/2014

· Disrepair!

· 1st Curfew!

· The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue:

186. JOSEPHINE Ward _Simon Cordell - application to transfer legal representation /

Page Numbers: 432,433

Simon's Solicitor complaint - Application to transfer legal representation

Gazebo Case!

· The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue:

187. JOSEPHINE Ward _Simon’s case (2) /

Page Numbers: 434

Simon's Solicitor complaint - Application to transfer legal representation

Gazebo Case!

· The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue:

188. JOSEPHINE WARD _RE_ Simon Cordell - application to transfer legal representation /

Page Numbers: 435,436,437,438,439,

440,441,442,443

Simon's Solicitor complaint - Application to transfer legal representation

Gazebo Case!

The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue:

186. JOSEPHINE Ward _Simon Cordell - application to transfer legal representation

/ Page Numbers: 432,433,

From: JOSEPHINE WARD [josephinewardsolicitor@gmail.com]

Sent: 02 February 2014 14:31

To: too smooth; Lorraine Cordell

Subject: Simon Cordell application

to transfer legal representation Simon Further to your telephone conversation with me today during which you have accused me of not representing you correctly and not defending your case properly you leave me with little choice but to list the case at Woolwich Crown Court in order that your legal representation order can be revoked. I am cancelling your 2pm conference with me for Tuesday

04th February 2014

I am not prepared to be subjected to threats about you blackening my name over Facebook. I work very hard for all my clients and my track record as a Criminal Defence Solicitors attests to that. I have represented you since you were a juvenile to the best of my abilities, and I have never not defended a client properly or tried my best for my client. You stated that during the telephone conversation that the Judge asked you to change your solicitors at the last bail hearing on Christmas Eve. As you are aware, I was on annual leave from

23rd December 2013

I made the bail variation as requested and you were not happy as the court did not suspend your curfew. That is the simple fact of the matter here. You also stated that during a conference with Jemi, the barrister that I appointed for you that he also advised you that I was a poor solicitor and not acting in your best interests. You only raised this today and I will most certainly be taking this accusation up with Jemi and his clerks. I asked you to confirm this in writing and you have refused to do this. I again ask you to confirm this in writing as Jemi will have to respond to this allegation. I will be asking Jemi and his clerks to comment on the allegations that you have made. You will of course appreciate that if Jemi does not agree with your accusations that he will probably refuse to represent you. You are accusing him of slandering my reputation by saying that Jemi says I am not representing you properly and that he advised you to change your solicitors. With regards to your complaint in relation to the bail variation you were asked in a number of emails to provide full details of your plans, venues etc and you did not do this instead you shouted down the phone and refused to give specific instructions. When you eventually did give the requested information, it was too late to apply to have the bail position varied. I suspect you know what the court's attitude to the requested variation would be in any event. With regards to the request for the original receipt I have to provide this to the court in an addendum to your defence case statement and the police will then make their enquiries. I am sorry that this position has arisen, but you have left me little choice in the matter. I wish you good luck with your case and I will confirm the date that your case is listed for the revocation of legal aid. I will aim from Tuesday or Wednesday of this coming week. Can you please confirm by return email the advice that Jemi gave you at your conference at Isleworth Crown Court and also please confirm why it took you so long to raise it with me? You telephoned me on a Sunday, reserved for emergency phone calls. You should have raised it back when you had the conference with Jemi. You have raised it now and I will deal with the accusations now. I await hearing from you by return email with regards to Jemi.

Regards

Josephine Ward

433,

MICHAEL CARROLL & CO SOLICITIORS

The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue:

187. JOSEPHINE Ward _Simon’s case (2)

/ Page Numbers: 434,

From: JOSEPHINE WARD [josephinewardsolicitor@gmail.com]

Sent: 02 February 2014 14:42

To: Lorraine Cordell

Subject: Simon's case

Lorraine

I am sorry that I am left with no choice but to apply to Woolwich Crown Court to have Simon's legal representation order revoked. I hope that this will not affect my friendship with you, Benjy, Dionne or Tyrone. This is not a personal decision or one that I have come to lightly. My professional integrity has been called in to question and slanderous threats made and I cannot condone that. Take care and I will chat you hopefully in the near future.

Regards

Josephine

The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue:

188. JOSEPHINE WARD _RE_ Simon Cordell - application to transfer legal representation

/ Page Numbers: 435,436,437,438,439,440,441,442,443,

From: JOSEPHINE WARD [josephinewardsolicitor@gmail.com]

Sent: 02 February 2014 23:58

To: Lorraine Cordell

Subject: RE: Simon Cordell application to transfer legal representation

Hi Lorraine

It is 10.47pm. I do not have Simon's file at home with me. I will ask Jemi to respond to the allegations made by Simon re his conference on

13th December 2013.

At the same time, I will ask him and his clerks to respond to why the Christmas bail variation was not made on

19th December 2013.

As you are both aware, I was on annual leave until

06th January 2014.

Simon's case is listed for trial in

June 2014.

There is enough time to secure the information but there is a process. With regards to the section 8 application Jemi has been on notice that this has been required since before Christmas. A detailed defence case statement was submitted and as a result of this document and the Crown's failure to disclose the requested items that the Third-Party Disclosure arise as did the section 8 application. If the Insurance company believe Mr Patel has committed a fraud, then it is their decision whether he is prosecuted. Nikki Diamond has to confirm her unwillingness to disclose the file before I can apply for Third Party Disclosure. I cannot take a statement from her as part of her statement will require her to disclose and exhibit as part of that statement the original insurance claims and she cannot do this as client confidentiality arises. Re Simon's most recent request to vary bail he did not provide the information when requested. I have dealt with this point already as I have re the Third-Party Disclosure and the section 8 application. I am not prepared to have my professional judgement or integrity called into question. Simon threatened to blacken my name on Facebook Lorraine. I am reliant on instructions from my client re bail variations. I am reliant on Counsel drafting applications re section 8. I drafted Simon's original bail application and defence case statement well within the time limits. All other requests to vary bail I have made. Due to the number of bail variations Simon is aware of the process and trying to get the variations agreed administratively. He is also aware of the attitude if the Court to his case the issues regarding Simon's case when I am on leave, I have no control over. Simon himself caused problems in this case by

(a) his behaviour on arrest

(b) his comments to police when the police were at his house re the number of items bought as a job lot. There was no evidence of this apart from what came from Simon himself.

(c) The gazebo in his garden was easily dealt with as he had the original receipt

(d) Simon ignoring legal advice in his interviews (e) Simon's inaccurate interpretation on the law on burglary and what squatters can and cannot do whilst squatting in a building. There is a risk that Simon will be convicted in this case and this is not through the fault of Michael Carroll & Co or my representation but through his own conduct on his arrest and at the police station. To try to blame other people for the position he finds himself in is very wrong.

Simple questions to consider:

1. Did the police know about or have any evidence re the job lot answer No until Simon himself revealed this

2. Could Simon explain his DNA in a moveable object answer. Yes, and he would have achieved the same result as Naomi

3. Could police prove the Venice chair came from warehouse no. Information on this again came from Simon

436,

4. Is Mohammed likely to be a witness as to sale of the items?

No because he will have to be advised to obtain independent legal advice as he could incriminate himself This was better left to cross examination at trial as too late then to produce invoices, but Simon obviously does not agree. This will be an example of Simon making a further tactical mistake as he did during the comments to police at his address and again in interview. The Judge and prosecution will be influenced in making decisions in this case based on Simon's conduct before arrest, in interview and his previous convictions. The point that Simon is missing is that a prima facie case exists, and this case will go to trial. Simon should reread his interview and his attitude in his interview where he effectively suggests it serves the owner of the premises right for having his premises burgled. If Simon had not made such foolish comments when he was arrested and instead followed sound legal advice at the police station then we could have made representations to review the case but based on his admissions at his address, coupled with his interview this was impossible. At the start of this case Simon was very much mistaken with regards to the law. Tactics and timing are important in cases. Simon does not want to allow Solicitors to make tactical decisions so the best of luck to him. Once I get an email back from Jemi re the conference and section 8 application I will be listing this case to have the legal representation order revoked. During the telephone conversation today Simon again was abusive, he questioned my professional integrity, my ability to defend my clients and he threatened to slander my name. I heard him loud and clear Lorraine. All I can say is he has a very short memory. I know exactly how many times I have represented Simon and how many of those cases have resulted in a charge or a conviction. I am duty solicitor at court tomorrow and I will email Jemi in the morning. I will request an urgent response from him, and I will then let you know when the case will be listed.

Kind regards

Josephine

Hi Josey

Simon has asked me to write this email, so I am just writing what has been asked and the facts he is saying. As you are aware Simon is not great with Emails or letters and replying to them due to his writing and spelling. Simon has said he is not treating you in anyway, yes, he did say he was going to put his papers on Facebook to ask people what they feel about his case. He would then be able to obtain feedback from the general public. He feels there have been many errors in his case, some of these errors he wants me to list below.

437,

His case was listed for the warn list for the

16/12/2013,

this could not happen due to issues with the crown not giving the information over. You at this time wanted it to go to trial and the morning the trail started wanted to list information that was needed for Simon case. When Simon went to see his Barrister on the

13/12/2013

the barrister new nothing about the case and asked Simon to explain what his case was about. While Simon was explaining his barrister told Simon not to rush, Simon showed the barrister the invoices for the case and the barrister said these invoices were hear say, can he prove the items were even in the building at the time Simon was there. The Barrister asked where the disclosure, as what we showed him was rubbish. We had most of the case files with us that you had emailed to us. The Barrister asked has a section 8- and Third-Party Disclosure been put in, we told him no he said as soon as we get back get your solicitors to put a section 8- and Third-Party Disclosure in it should have been done already don’t delay get it done today. Solicitors aren't doing the job properly get onto them. The Barrister asked when is this in court we said next week, to which he said I don’t even know why you've been sent to me for this meeting as I’m on another case until Tuesday, Wednesday so won’t be able to represent you. The barrister also told me to get a copy of my interview tapes and go over them and mark any part that is wrong on the crown’s paperwork. Simon had about a 20 min with his barrister before the barrister had to go back into court. When an application for a Section 8- and Third-Party Disclosure was put into the court on the

19/12/2013

There was a time given that Simon solicitor had till the

16/01/2014

to submit the section 8 and the Third-Party Disclosure to the court. And that then the crown had until the

16/02/2014

to give the information that had been requested. If the crown failed to give the information the case would need to be relisted in court so this could be address. As of today’s, date

02/02/2014

we still do not know if the section 8 and the Third-Party Disclosure has been given to the court. The last email from you on this subject was dated the

27/01/2014

where you told us that Jemi has drafted the section 8 applications that require minor amendments before it can be served.

438,

As for the Third-Party Disclosure as of

29/01/2014

a letter to Nikki Diamond from the insurance company had just been sent over by yourself, I believe that this is the process that needs to happen before a Third Party Disclosure application can be put in as you need it in writing that the insurance company is not willing to hand over the file without the Third Party Disclosure. On the

13/12/2013

a call was made to Cunningham Lindsey where we talked to someone about the case for the insurance part of the claim, we were told that Nikki Diamond was not due back into the office until the

16/12/2013.

On the

16/12/2013

my mum called Cunningham Lindsey to talk to Nikki Diamond where we were told that Nikki Diamond was working from home that day and given Nikki Diamonds mobile number to call her. My mum then made a call to Nikki Diamond and we chatted about the case telling her what had happened in Simon case and what we believed had gone on. Nikki Diamond was concerned about what we had told her over the phone, and at this told us she needs to put this to her manager and could she take our phone number so that her or her manager could call us back. I give Nikki Diamond our contact information.

On the

17/12/2013

my mum took a call from Trevor Allaway Commercial Special Investigator for Cunningham Lindsey my mum and Trevor Allaway talked for some time over the phone about the case at which point in asked that could he have a meeting with Simon to take a statement from him, he also said he did not want to step on Simon solicitor feet and to please advise our solicitor as to what was going on and that he would like to have the meeting with Simon. After the called I Emailed you what had gone on and forwarded you a copy of the email Trevor Allaway had sent. You replied asking if the insurance company aware that Simon is awaiting trial for burglary. I replied yes; they were as I had disclosed this to them on the calls that were made. Nothing was done with this information so on the

08/01/2014

my mum made a call to Trevor Allaway to setup a meeting with him at my mum address this was set for the

13/01/2014

at 11am, when my mum spoke to Trevor Allaway, he told her that he will be being the complete file for the claim with him to the meeting. On the

13/01/2014

the meeting with Trevor Allaway went ahead. Where information was given by both parties. There was shock also on both sides about parts of information that was spoke about. Trevor Allaway even showed us pictures of which Nikki Diamond had taken on the

28/03/2014,

and was shocked to see the picture the police had taken for my case as they were the same pictures Mr Patel & D Patel had done nothing to the building and now, I was paying the price due to this. Trevor Allaway also made a call to Nikki Diamond to get dates for claims etc and to make sure he had all the facts correct. Nikki Diamond gave the dates of

439,

17/02/2013

for the 1st claim

25/03/2013

for a 2nd claim

07/06/2013

for the 3rd claim

We were shocked there was in fact a next claim we knew nothing for the

25/03/2013,

and also, the date for the last claim of the

07/06/2013

when in fact Simon case was for the

04/05/2013

We asked Trevor Allaway why the claim for

17/02/2013

and the

25/03/2013

was not paid out he said we did not believe the claim was real. He also said that when someone takes out insurance, they have to put down the condition of the property, and they also believed a lot of the damage to the building was from an earlier date. Trevor Allaway also said that to get out solicitors to go and get a statement from Nikki Diamond as she would be a creditable witness for Simon. All this was explained to you with an email that was sent to you on the

13/01/2014

by my mum and a phone call where I talked to you when you were on your way to the prison to see someone. I at this asked you also about his birthday and you said if Nikki Diamond could do a statement that said everything, I had said then there should be no problem for my birthday. My mum did get a next email from you that day asking for Nikki Diamond information as when the 1st email had been sent to you my mum had forgot to put it, my mum replied with the information for Nikki Diamond being mobile number and office address she could not at this point find Nikki Diamonds email address so this was not included. Emails was sent on the

15/01/2014

and the

18/01/2014

asking if a date had been setup for you to take the statement from Nikki Diamond and if the section 8 and the Third-Party Disclosure has been given to the court and for an update. You replied to this on the

18/01/2014.

On the

21/01/2014

my mum emailed you about the application for my curfew for my birthday, you replied to this asking for his plains for his birthday so you could put the application into the court. On the

22/01/2014

when I went to mums, she showed me the email I was upset with this due to the fact I did not see why I needed to give the locations as to where I was going. You said you had to have this to put the application in. My mum emailed you the details as to where I was going. As we had not heard anything, I believed the application had been put in and that it should have been heard on The

24/01/2014

my mum late on the

24/01/2014

emailed you and texted you to get an update as to the application. There was no reply to this from you until the

27/01/2014

where you told us, the application could not be put in due the notice you need to give the court.

440,

You also in that email explained the process needed for the Third-Party Disclosure application. In which was the 1st time I knew a letter would be needed to be sent to the insurance company and they would need to refuse to hand over the files before you could go for the Third-Party Disclosure application through the court. And also give me an update as to the section 8 application that you could confirm that Jemi has drafted the section 8 application that requires minor amendments before it can be served. But you knew this was needed when the application was put into the court on the

19/12/2014

when the application was heard for the section 8- and Third-Party Disclosure. So why was this only being address on

27/01/2014

when this then had already passed the date of the

16/01/2014

to hand the application into the court.

I feel this delay will again make my case take longer as there is still going to be a time given by the court to the crown to reply to the applications. On the

29/01/2013

a reply was made by email from my mum. Explaining parts in the letter that you attached to the email you sent on the

27/01/2014

for Nikki Diamond about the discloser of the file was not correct and needed amended. She also wrote that I still wanted a statement taken from Nikki Diamond due to this helping my case. You replied to this email on the

29/01/2014

saying that, the statement from Nikki Diamond will follow after the Insurance Company discloses the claims made by Mr Patel, whether voluntarily or by Third Party disclosure. I do feel this statement is 100% needed sooner not later as once this is shown to the crown I sure they will rethink their case on me. As I feel at this time this is an unfair trail due to how Mr Patel has used my case to be able to manipulate his insurance claim due to what has already been discussed with Trevor Allaway. And this is a clear beach in my human rights to have a fair trial. Also, on the

19/01/2013

when the application went into the court a bail application was meant to have been done at the same time for my bail conditions over the holidays that where upcoming. For some reason the bail application was not heard so you relisted this for

23/12/2013

to be heard by the court, you sent a text to my mum after you found out the outcome of this bail application in which you said I was on an electric tag to my mum address, and that the curfew was not lifted that Serco would come to my mums address to install the tag there. I got very upset with hearing this as I for one reason I was never on an electric tag for this case from the start of it. I did try and call you and I got no reply so I called the court explained to the court the issues I had and was advised to call my solicitor and ask them to relist the case for the

24/12/2013

this would need to be done within the next 20 mins. I then called the office and explained this to someone in the office and was told I would get a call back. I did not get a call back but at around 21.47 that evening you texted my mum saying that Simon needed to be at Woolwich crown court at 09.45 on the

24/12/2013.

On the

24/12/2013

I went to court and my mum come with me, when we got there, we were told the case was not listed before 11am. So, we waited at the court at around 10.50 as a barrister had not turned up for me my mum texted for to ask the name of the barrister that would be coming that we were outside court 7 waiting,

441,

there was no reply to this text so at around 11.10 I made a call to the office and spoke to someone there that told me a barrister would not be attending, I was really upset with this but what could I say. I then saw the usher of the court and told her what was going on, she said why had the solicitors told me to come here and yet new there would not be a barrister and not tell me this beforehand, she told me she would talk to the crown who was in the court room and explain to him what was going on and then let me know what could be done. About 5 mins later she came out of the court room and told me that the crown was going to call it on and see what could be done. It was called into court and when the judge heard I did not have a barrister she asked the clerk of the court to call the office and see what was going on, which the clerk on the court did, when she got off the phone she told the judge no one was coming to the court for me. I stood up and tried to explain to the judge what had gone on. My mum at this asked the judge if she could explain it and the judge said yes to come forward, she could hear what my mum was saying. My mum explained to the judge about the

19/12/2013

and the

23/12/2013

the judge was at loss of what could be done as the rule that had been made on the

23/01/2014

she could not change as this would be dealing with a judicial review and she could not hear that. The crown then asked if he could speak to the judge and said that due to new evidence, she could hear it on them grounds. The judge at that replied yes, she would like to hear this but I did not have a barrister she then went on to ask the barristers in the court room would they be willing to represent me and told them that I had legal aid and that it would be marked on the file. One stood up and said yes, she would stand in. the judge then said to us to go outside with the barrister and speak to her and when ready it would go back into court. We went out explained to the barrister what was going on. She told us that even from what she had heard in court that I should really think about changing solicitors. It went back into court and the judge heard the case and my bail was varied on the

01/01/2014

my mum again texted you due to an issue where I got arrested, she had tried to call the office but there was no answer of a voice mail message to give a number to call. No one got back to my mum so when she got to court, she had to ask a solicitor that was on duty that day to help me. He said he was not meant to as I had legal aid for the case already, but he would go and speak to me, he did in fact represent me in court that day. On the

03/01/2014

I asked my mum sent you an email to ask if my case was too much for you as I knew you had a lot of work on. You told me you were still on annual leave and I return to work on Monday. On the

31/01/2014

I was due to have a meeting in the office which you had to cancel as you were dealing with other cases. This was re booked for

04/01/2014

given.

442,

There was a break down before in this case as you are aware and I dropped the complaint. Josey, I have used you as a solicitor for many years and don’t just look at you as a solicitor you are a friend of the families. All I want is for my case to be dealt with in a correct manner, which will lead me to have a speedy and fair trial, and I don’t want to feel like I am being punished for a crime that I have not been convicted of. And I feel with the statement from Nikki Diamond that would show somewhat to Mr Patel ways in how he has dealt with his insurance case in this matter that clearly is not correct all ready. Could you please email back at the points that have been included in this email, and if you feel I am wrong on any points or the way in which I am feeling.

Simon

From: JOSEPHINE WARD [Mail To:josephinewardsolicitor@gmail.com]

Sent: 02 February 2014 14:31

To: too smooth; Lorraine Cordell

Subject: Simon Cordell application

to transfer legal representation

Simon

Further to your telephone conversation with me today during which you have accused me of not representing you correctly and not defending your case properly you leave me with little choice but to list the case at Woolwich Crown Court in order that your legal representation order can be revoked.

I am cancelling your 2pm conference with me for Tuesday

04th February 2014.

23rd December 2013

443,

poor solicitor and not acting in your best interests. You only raised this today and I will most certainly be taking this accusation up with Jemi and his clerks. I asked you to confirm this inwriting and you have refused to do this. I again ask you to confirm this in writing as Jemi will have to respond to this allegation. I will be asking Jemi and his clerks to comment on the allegations that you have made. You will of course appreciate that if Jemi does not agree with your accusations that he will probably refuse to represent you. You are accusing him of slandering my reputation by saying that Jemi says I am not representing you properly and that he advised you to change your solicitors. With regards to your complaint in relation to the bail variation you were asked in a number of emails to provide full details of your plans, venues etc and you did not do this instead you shouted down the phone and refused to give specific instructions. When you eventually did give the requested information, it was too late to apply to have the bail position varied. I suspect you know what the court's attitude to the requested variation would be in any event. With regards to the request for the original receipt I have to provide this to the court in an addendum to your defence case statement and the police will then make their enquiries. I am sorry that this position has arisen, but you have left me little choice in the matter. I wish you good luck with your case and I will confirm the date that your case is listed for the revocation of legal aid. I will aim from Tuesday or Wednesday of this coming week. Can you please confirm by return email the advice that Jemi gave you at your conference at Isleworth Crown Court and also please confirm why it took you so long to raise it with me?

You telephoned me on a Sunday, reserved for emergency phone calls. You should have raised it back when you had the conference with Jemi. You have raised it now and I will deal with the accusations now. I await hearing from you by return email with regards to Jemi.

Regards

Josephine Ward

MICHAEL CARROLL & CO SOLICITIORS

Si Note:

Disrepair!

Incompetent is how I feel after trying to address the mutable amounts of incorrect issues with my flat after deciding with the Enfield Council and the Enfield Homes teams to rectify the problems of concern, and after they Finish letting me down in their services, as I am the one who has to live in such dreadful rented conditions!

Time Spent Building;

My mother also continues to work on building my company website for me with others at the Time Start: 09:00 and Time End: 14:00!

Working at Home doing Court Case Defence Work!

I spent time and resources costing expenditure with my mother also building my defence case, against the allegations getting put against me at the Time Start: 12:00 Am and Time End: 06:00 Am!

03/02/2014

Stuck on bail at my Own Home Address again for the Woolwich Crown Court Case!

Building the catalogue with Josh!

Issues with Housing Disrepair!

Working on My Website!

With Partner Two!

03/02/2014

· Disrepair!

· 1st Curfew!

· The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue:

189. Lorraine Cordell _Re_ Simon Cordell - application to transfer legal representation_ (1) /

Page Numbers: 444,445,446,447,448

Simon's Solicitor complaint - Application to transfer legal representation

Gazebo Case!

· The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue:

191. JOSEPHINE WARD_ /

Page Numbers: 449,450

Simon's Solicitor complaint - Application to transfer legal representation

Gazebo Case!

· The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue:

192. Lorraine Cordell _Re_ Simon Cordell - application to transfer legal representation /

Page Numbers: 451,452,453,454,455,456,457,458,459

Simon's Solicitor complaint - Application to transfer legal representation

Gazebo Case!

· The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue:

193. JOSEPHINE Ward _Simon Cordell_ (2) /

Page Numbers: 460

Simon's Solicitor complaint - Application to transfer legal representation

Gazebo Case!

· The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue:

19 JOSEPHINE Ward_ Simon Cordell /

Page Numbers: 68

Simon's Solicitor complaint - Application to transfer legal representation

Gazebo Case!

The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue:

189. Lorraine Cordell _Re_ Simon Cordell - application to transfer legal representation_ (1)

/ Page Numbers: 444,445,446,447,448,

From: Lorraine Cordell [lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk]

Sent: 02 February 2014 22:32

To: 'JOSEPHINE WARD'

Subject: RE: Simon Cordell application

to transfer legal representation

Hi Josey

Simon has asked me to write this email, so I am just writing what has been asked and the facts he is saying. As you are aware Simon is not great with Emails or letters and replying to them due to his writing and spelling. Simon has said he is not treating you in anyway, yes, he did say he was going to put his papers on Facebook ton ask people what they feel about his case. He would then be able to obtain feedback from the general public. He feels there have been many errors in his case, some of these errors he wants me to list below. His case was listed for the warn list for the

16/12/2013,

13/12/2013

the barrister new nothing about the case and asked Simon to explain what his case was about. While Simon was explaining his barrister told Simon not to rush, Simon showed the barrister the invoices for the case and the barrister said these invoices were hear say, can he prove the items were even in the building at the time Simon was there. The Barrister asked where the disclosure, as what we showed him was rubbish. We had most of the case files with us that you had emailed to us. The Barrister asked has a section 8- and Third-Party Disclosure been put in, we told him no he said as soon as we get back get your solicitors to put a section 8- and Third-Party Disclosure in it should have been done already don’t delay get it done today. Solicitors aren't doing the job properly get onto them. The Barrister asked when is this in court we said next week, to which he said I don’t even know why you've been sent to me for this meeting as I’m on another case until Tuesday, Wednesday so won’t be able to represent you. The barrister also told me to get a copy of my interview tapes and go over them and mark any part that is wrong on the crowns paperwork. Simon had about a 20 min with his barrister before the barrister had to go back into court. When an application for a Section 8- and Third-Party Disclosure was put into the court on the

19/12/2013

There was a time given that Simon solicitor had till the

16/01/2014

to submit the section 8 and the Third-Party Disclosure to the court. And that then the crown had until the

16/02/2014

to give the information that had been requested. If the crown failed to give the information the case would need to be relisted in court so this could be address. As of today’s, date

02/02/2014

we still do not know if the section 8 and the Third-Party Disclosure has been given to the court. The last email from you on this subject was dated the

27/01/2014

where you told us that Jemi has drafted the section 8 applications that require minor amendments before it can be served. As for the Third-Party Disclosure as of

29/01/2014

13/12/2013

a call was made to Cunningham Lindsey where we talked to someone about the case for the insurance part of the claim, we were told that Nikki Diamond was not due back into the office until the

16/12/2013.

On the

16/12/2013

my mum called Cunningham Lindsey to talk to Nikki Diamond where we were told that Nikki Diamond was working from home that day and given Nikki Diamonds mobile number to call her.

445,

My mum then made a call to Nikki Diamond and we chatted about the case telling her what had happened in Simon case and what we believed had gone on. Nikki Diamond was concerned about what we had told her over the phone, and at this told us she needs to put this to her manager and could she take our phone number so that her or her manager could call us back. I give Nikki Diamond our contact information. On the

17/12/2013

08/01/2014

my mum made a call to Trevor Allaway to setup a meeting with him at my mum address this was set for the

13/01/2014

at 11am, when my mum spoke to Trevor Allaway, he told her that he will be being the complete file for the claim with him to the meeting. On the

13/01/2014

28/03/2014

17/02/2013

for the 1st claim

25/03/2013

for a 2nd claim

07/06/2013

for the 3rd claim

We were shocked there was in fact a next claim we knew nothing for the

25/03/2013,

and also, the date for the last claim of the

07/06/2013

when in fact Simon case was for the

04/05/2013

We asked Trevor Allaway why the claim for

17/02/2013

and the

25/03/2013

13/01/2014

15/01/2014

and the

18/01/2014

18/01/2014.

On the

21/01/2014

my mum emailed you about the application for my curfew for my birthday, you replied to this asking for his plains for his birthday so you could put the application into the court. On the

22/01/2014

24/01/2014

my mum late on the

24/01/2014

emailed you and texted you to get an update as to the

446,

application. There was no reply to this from you until the

27/01/2014

where you told us, the application could not be put in due the notice you need to give the court. You also in that email explained the process needed for the Third-Party Disclosure application. In which was the 1st time I knew a letter would be needed to be sent to the insurance company and they would need to refuse to hand over the files before you could go for the Third-Party Disclosure application through the court. And also give me an update as to the section 8 application that you could confirm that Jemi has drafted the section 8 application that requires minor amendments before it can be served. But you knew this was needed when the application was put into the court on the

19/12/2014

when the application was heard for the section 8- and Third-Party Disclosure. So why was this only being address on

27/01/2014,

when this then had already passed the date of the

16/01/2014

to hand the application into the court.

I feel this delay will again make my case take longer as there is still going to be a time given by the court to the crown to reply to the applications. On the

29/01/2013

a reply was made by email from my mum. Explaining parts in the letter that you attached to the email you sent on the

27/01/2014

29/01/2014

19/01/2013

23/12/2013

24/12/2013

24/12/2013.

On the

24/12/2013

I went to court and my mum come with me, when we got there, we were told the case was not listed before 11am. So we waited at the court at around 10.50 as a barrister had not turned up for me my mum texted for to ask the name of the barrister that would be coming that we were outside court 7 waiting, there was no reply to this text so at around 11.10 I made a call to the office and spoke to someone there that told me a barrister would not be attending, I was really upset with this but what could I say. I then saw the usher of the court and told her what was going on, she said why had the solicitors told me to come here and yet new there would not be a barrister and not tell me this beforehand, she told me she would talk to the crown who was in the court room and explain to him what was going on and then let me know what could be done. About 5 mins later she came out of the court room and told me that the crown was going to call it on and see what could be done. It was called into court and when the judge heard I did not have a barrister she asked the clerk of the court to call the office and see what was going on, which the clerk on the court did, when she got off the phone she told the judge no one was coming to the court for me. I stood up and tried to explain to the judge what had gone on. My mum at this asked the judge if she could explain it and the judge said yes to come forward, she could hear what my mum was saying. My mum explained to the judge about the

19/12/2013

and the

23/12.2013

the judge was at loss of what could be done as the rule that had been made on the

23/01/2014

447,

barristers in the court room would they be willing to represent me and told them that I had legal aid and that it would be marked on the file. One stood up and said yes, she would stand in. the judge then said to us to go outside with the barrister and speak to her and when ready it would go back into court. We went out explained to the barrister what was going on. She told us that even from what she had heard in court that I should really think about changing solicitors. It went back into court and the judge heard the case and my bail was varied on the

01/01/2014

03/01/2014

I asked my mum sent you an email to ask if my case was too much for you as I knew you had a lot of work on. You told me you were still on annual leave and I return to work on Monday. On the

31/01/2014

I was due to have a meeting in the office which you had to cancel as you were dealing with other cases. This was re booked for

04/01/2014

at 2pm. I have called you many times and it has just gone to voice mail and you have not called me back. I have also called the office about things I feel are wrong and told someone would call me back which has not happened. I can prove this with statements from the phones that were used. There are emails that have been sent to you and no reply to them emails and what I have asked have been given. There was a break down before in this case as you are aware and I dropped the complaint. Josey, I have used you as a solicitor for many years and don’t just look at you as a solicitor you are a friend of the families. All I want is for my case to be dealt with in a correct manner, which will lead me to have a speedy and fair trial, and I don’t want to feel like I am being punished for a crime that I have not been convicted of. And I feel with the statement from Nikki Diamond that would show somewhat to Mr Patel ways in how he has dealt with his insurance case in this matter that clearly is not correct all ready. Could you please email back at the points that have been included in this email, and if you feel I am wrong on any points or the way in which I am feeling.

Simon

From: JOSEPHINE WARD [Mail To:josephinewardsolicitor@gmail.com]

Sent: 02 February 2014 14:31

To: too smooth; Lorraine Cordell

Subject: Simon Cordell application

to transfer legal representation

Simon

04th February 2014.

I am not prepared to be subjected to threats about you blackening my name over Facebook. I work very hard for all my clients and my track record as a Criminal Defence Solicitors attests to that.

I have represented you since you were a juvenile to the best of my abilities, and I have never not defended a client properly or tried my best for my client. You stated that during the telephone conversation that the Judge asked you to change your solicitors at

448,

the last bail hearing on Christmas Eve. As you are aware, I was on annual leave from

23rd December 2013.

Regards

Josephine Ward

MICHAEL CARROLL & CO SOLICITIORS

The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue:

191. JOSEPHINE WARD_

/ Page Numbers: 449,450,451

From: JOSEPHINE WARD [josephinewardsolicitor@gmail.com]

Sent: 03 February 2014 23:51

To: Lorraine Cordell

Hi Josey

Lorraine as a matter of respect to you I have responded to the most recent email now that I have some time. My replies to Simon are in bold. I accept that Simon believes his comments before being arrested are not damaging to his case and he believes that his interview is well thought out and legally reasoned. Unfortunately, I do not agree with Simon's belief that his comments and interview are not damaging to the case - they are what made the difference in this case. Thank you for the reply to Simon’s email, Simon has asked me to write this email for him. The section of my email that was sent to you yesterday that address Jemi and the meeting we had come from my friend Katie who did attend the meeting with Jemi with me, so new what was said and I used her words as to what she heard at the meeting as to what Jemi said to me. If needed Katie could confirm this so can my mum as she was the one writing the email for me that was sent yesterday. Could you also please send me a copy as to what you have sent over to Jemi by email and his reply to your email?

(a) Simon / Lorraine I have emailed the email I sent to Jemi and his response. This was based on the conversation and accusations made by Simon on the telephone

Sunday 2nd February 2014.

With regards to Jemi's non-availability. Jemi was booked for Simon's case and his jury was out and at risk of over running. You were advised of this fact at the time. What does happen sometimes is that once speeches are done in a case the barrister can get an alternative barrister to baby sit the case. Also, Simon's case was in the warned list, not given a fixture so there was no guarantee that the case would be listed. The case Jemi was dealing with at the time should have been a five-day case but it over ran, I agree the case is now listed for the warned list for the week commencing

30th June 2014

As you are aware on the

19/12/2013

when my mum got the email from you about my case about the application that was put to the court that day, when my mum got the email she was very worried due to the date for the listing for the new trial date, so she herself called you before she had even showed me the email. She knew the new trial date would cause a delay in my case by 6 months or more. she asked you some things on the phone on the

19/01/2014

one being if we got the information from the crown could the date of the

30/06/2014

(b) Yes, Simon I agree I did say this to your mother. I said there was a chance and I did not put it any higher than that. It is this that is upsetting me so much as the longer it takes to put the applications into the court the longer it will take to get the information that is needed in my case. As you know I am on bail conditions that have stopped me doing anything for my business that I have been setting up for many years now. In fact, I have lost a lot of business due to the bail conditions I am on. I do not think it is right that a judge to say to me that I can sub contract my business out, I am not talking here a small amount of money for my sound system or any of my equipment, if it was lost or damaged it could take a long time in which to recover the costs. This is why when my equipment is hired, I also go with it due to me being able to look after it and make sure they don’t red line my equipment or it is damage or taken, I myself take care of it. And I do feel my human rights are being violated by the court and crown not allowing me to do my work. The longer it takes this case to go to court for trial is the longer my business cannot run this is why I am so upset that things are not being put in on time to the court. I have spent many years getting to where I am today

450,

within my business and due to this case, my business is has suffered.

(c) I have no control over Crown Court Judge's decisions re bail. They apply the Bail Act and the objections under this legislation in determining whether an individual should be given bail. You were originally refused bail due to fears that you would commit further offences and fail to surrender. I secured you bail, and I made this application out of office hours so you did not spend any longer in custody that what was necessary. I have made all requested bail variations with the exception of the one for your birthday as you did not feel you needed to provide me with the specifics of the variation and instead chose to argue with me about the rights of the Crown Court to require this information. Yes, I agree my case is in the warned list for the week of the

30/06/2014

(d) As stated to your mother when the information from the insurance company is disclosed whether voluntarily or by Third Party Disclosure the Crown Prosecution Service would have been invited to review the evidence. I do not have this information. I did request this information in my defence case statement as it is information in Mr Patel's possession and the prosecution could have asked him for this. Likewise, the first burglary this should have been disclosed to us under normal disclosure rules, but the court has insisted on a section 8 application for this. As for what I said at my home and at police station is not the issue here I knows what I said and was being honest as I did not think I had done anything wrong. I did buy the items from Mohammed in good faith. (I asked you for details of Mohammed with a view to taking a witness statement. I also advised you that he would have to be advised to seek independent legal representation to avoid self in crimination. Never provided) For it to have been a job lot of 5 of each or just 1 gazebo, and 1 chair which was found at my address I think the police would have taken the same said outcome to this case. They wanted someone for this case, and I was that person. This can be shown by any information we have asked for not being given they still have not even given the CAD reports for that day in truth that there was other police at the scene and let me in the building knowing I was there to hire my sound system for a private party that night as I explained this to them when I got there. Let alone how many times they attended the building on that evening even down to the council attending with the police due to noise. There is also the case as to when I turned up at the building and the police was already there, how is it when they did their checks, they did not see that a Burglary had happened on that building on the

16/02/2013

and let us enter the building knowing this as really, they would have got that report back on their checks that evening Which in my eyes does show a cover up as where are the reports as it is to do directly with my case. The DC dealing with my case also dealt with the other case on

16/02/2013

so, would also been aware of the condition of the building after the

16/02/2013

pictures where taken for the case of the

16/02/2013,

so, he would have been well aware the pictures taken for my case was the same so how could he then charge me with all the damage to the building?

Where is the information that the police should have asked Mr Patel as to him securing the building after the?

16/02/2013?

(e) This is a matter for cross examination and the officer in witness box where he does not have any room to manouvere. Yes I am upset as I do feel I have been setup by the police and they by doing this have allowed Mr Patel to use my case to make his claim to the insurance company go ahead was this planned from the start and yes I have asked this to myself many times and others I have spoken to have said the same said thing.

(f) Simon based on the forensic evidence recovered at the scene the police had reasonable grounds to arrest you for this offence. So yes, I want my trail sooner than later as I want to get on with my life and my business and yes, I do understand I could be found guilty for this case but until I do, I should be able to run my business. And I don’t think I am asking too much here.

451

I believe also that it could be taken to the high court for a judicial review about my bail condition, but I was never made aware of this. Seeing as the crown court attitude in this case has never been good as you have put it. And that the court is unwilling to see that I need to work or face losing my business.

(g) The bail conditions imposed by the Court are not unreasonable. They are imposed to prevent the commission of further offences and failure to surrender. I have never tried to blame other people for the position I find myself in, what I am saying is I don’t feel as if things are being done in a timely manner.

If you just look at the Third Party Disclosure, if you knew that you had to write to Nikki Diamond and get her to say in writing her unwillingness to disclose the file before you could then apply for the Third Party Disclosure, why did you not write the letter back in

Dec 2013

after the application was put into the court on the

19/12/2013

or after you come back from annual leave, due to knowing that you needed this before the

16/01/2014

that the judge had said.

(h) The information that forms part of Third-Party Disclosure was originally requested in your defence case statement. Your trial is now scheduled for

June 2014

and yes, in an ideal world I should have sent a letter to Nikki Diamond and the insurance company. Nikkii Diamond has to refuse to give the information first of all before the Court will even entertain an application for Third Party Disclosure and then the Court could direct the information to be brought to court for the trial. This is what happens in Social Services cases by way of example. We would request paper copies, failing that then a statement from Nikki Diamond. If the insurance file is served, then Nikki Diamond is not required as a witness as the insurance claims and reports can be introduced under the hearsay rules. I do understand you were waiting for Jemi to do the write up for the section 8 and that was out of your control. But the Third-Party Disclosure was not. Also why was it when we told you about getting a statement from Nikki Diamond did you not say then you had to wait until the Third-Party Disclosure was given as she would not be able to do a statement without client confidentiality arising which would have caused issues. You told me on the phone that if you got the statement from Nikki Diamond then the bail condition change, I wanted for my birthday should not be a problem.

(I) I said it was worth a try. I did not put it any higher than this. I do not recall saying it would not be a problem but words to the effect that it would be worth a try. We are covering old ground here as I was also reliant on specific information that you refused to give as you felt the court had no right to know your movements. Can you also keep me updated as to the date for court so I can attend?

(j) No problem I am hoping to resolve this matter once I speak to Michael Carroll tomorrow in the afternoon so I will be asking for a hearing on either Thursday or Friday of this week.

Simon

The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue:

192. Lorraine Cordell _Re_ Simon Cordell - application to transfer legal representation

/ Page Numbers: 451,452,453,454,455,456,457,458,459,

From: Lorraine Cordell [lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk]

Sent: 03 February 2014 18:51

To: 'JOSEPHINE WARD'

Subject: RE: Simon Cordell - application to transfer legal representation

Hi Josey

Thank you for the reply to Simon’s email, Simon has asked me to write this email for him. The section of my email that was sent to you yesterday that address Jemi and the meeting we had come from my friend Katie who did attend the meeting with Jemi with me, so new what was said and I used her words as to what she heard at the meeting as to what Jemi said to me. If needed Katie could confirm this so can my mum as she was the one writing the email for me that was sent yesterday. Could you also please send me a copy as to what you have sent over to Jemi by email and his reply to your email?

I agree the case is now listed for the warned list for the week commencing 30th June 2014.

As you are aware on the

19/12/2013

19/01/2014

one being if we got the information from the crown could the date of the

30/06/2014

be taken sooner. You replied once we get the information form the crown and Third-Party Disclosure it could be listed back in court and there maybe was a chance to being the date forward for the hearing, this is the information she told me. It is this that is upsetting me so much as the longer it takes to put the applications into the court the longer it will take to get the information that is needed in my case.

As you know I am on bail conditions that have stopped me doing anything for my business that I have been setting up for many years now. In fact, I have lost a lot of business due to the bail conditions I am on. I do not think it is right that a judge to say to me that I can sub contract my business out, I am not talking here a small amount of money for my sound system or any of my equipment, if it was lost or damaged it could take a long time in which to recover the costs. This is why when my equipment is hired, I also go with it due to me being able to look after it and make sure they don’t red line my equipment or it is damage or taken, I myself take care of it. And I do feel my human rights are being violated by the court and crown not allowing me to do my work. The longer it takes this case to go to court for trial is the longer my business cannot run this is why I am so upset that things are not being put in on time to the court. I have spent many years getting to where I am today within my business and due to this case, my business is has suffered. Yes, I agree my case is in the warned list for the week of the

30/06/2014

but would like the information well before this date so that maybe the trial can be taken forward. I would also like it sooner than later so the facts as to how Mr Patel has done this can be shown to the crown. As for what I said at my home and at police station is not the issue here I knows what I said and was being honest as I did not think I had done anything wrong. I did buy the items from Mohammed in good faith. For it to have been a job lot of 5 of each or just 1 gazebo, and 1 chair which was found at my address I think the police would have taken the same said outcome to this case. They wanted someone for this case and I was that person. This can be shown by any information we have asked for not being given they still have not even given the CAD reports for that day in truth that there were other police at the scene and let me in the building knowing I was there to hire my sound system for a private party that night as I explained this to them when I got there. Let alone how many times they attended the building on that evening even down to the council attending with the police due to noise. There is also the case as to when I turned up at the building and the police was already there, how is it when they did their checks, they did not see that a Burglary had happened on that building on the

16/02/2013

and let us

452,

enter the building knowing this as really, they would have got that report back on their checks that evening Which in my eyes does show a cover up as where are the reports as it is to do directly with my case. The DC dealing with my case also dealt with the other case on

16/02/2013

so, would also been aware of the condition of the building after the

16/02/2013

pictures where taken for the case of the

16/02/2013,

so, he would have been well aware the pictures taken for my case was the same so how could he then charge me with all the damage to the building?

Where is the information that the police should have asked Mr Patel as to him securing the building after the?

16/02/2013?

Yes I am upset as I do feel I have been setup by the police and they by doing this have allowed Mr Patel to use my case to make his claim to the insurance company go ahead was this planned from the start and yes I have asked this to myself many times and others I have spoken to have said the same said thing. So yes, I want my trail sooner than later as I want to get on with my life and my business and yes, I do understand I could be found guilty for this case but until I do, I should be able to run my business. And I don’t think I am asking too much here. I believe also that it could be taken to the high court for a judicial review about my bail condition, but I was never be made aware of this. Seeing as the crown court attitude in this case has never been good as you have put it. And that the court is unwilling to see that I need to work or face losing my business. I have never tried to blame other people for the position I find myself in, what I am saying is I don’t feel as if things are being done in a timely manner. If you just look at the Third Party Disclosure, if you knew that you had to write to Nikki Diamond and get her to say in writing her unwillingness to disclose the file before you could then apply for the Third Party Disclosure, why did you not write the letter back in

Dec 2013

after the application was put into the court on the

19/12/2013

or after you come back from annual leave, due to knowing that you needed this before the

16/01/2014

that the judge had said. I do understand you were waiting for Jemi to do the write up for the section 8 and that was out of your control. But the Third-Party Disclosure was not. Also why was it when we told you about getting a statement from Nikki Diamond did you not say then you had to wait until the Third-Party Disclosure was given as she would not be able to do a statement without client confidentiality arising which would have caused issues. You told me on the phone that if you got the statement from Nikki Diamond then the bail condition change, I wanted for my birthday should not be a problem. Can you also keep me updated as to the date for court so I can attend?

Simon

From: JOSEPHINE WARD [Mail To:josephinewardsolicitor@gmail.com]

Sent: 02 February 2014 23:58

To: Lorraine Cordell

Subject: RE: Simon Cordell application

to transfer legal representation

Hi Lorraine

It is 10.47pm. I do not have Simon's file at home with me. I will ask Jemi to respond to the allegations made by Simon re his conference on

13th December 2013

At the same time, I will ask him and his clerks to respond to why the Christmas bail variation was not made on

19th December 2013.

As you are both aware, I was on annual leave until

06th January 2014

Simon's case is listed for trial in

June 2014

There is enough time to secure the information but there is a process.

453,

With regards to the section 8 application Jemi has been on notice that this has been required since before Christmas. A detailed defence case statement was submitted and as a result of this document and the Crown's failure to disclose the requested items that the Third-Party Disclosure arise as did the section 8 application. If the Insurance company believe Mr Patel has committed a fraud, then it is their decision whether he is prosecuted. Nikki Diamond has to confirm her unwillingness to disclose the file before I can apply for Third Party Disclosure. I cannot take a statement from her as part of her statement will require her to disclose and exhibit as part of that statement the original insurance claims and she cannot do this as client confidentiality arises. Re Simon's most recent request to vary bail he did not provide the information when requested. I have dealt with this point already as I have re the Third-Party Disclosure and the section 8 application. I am not prepared to have my professional judgement or integrity called into question. Simon threatened to blacken my name on Facebook Lorraine. I am reliant on instructions from my client re bail variations. I am reliant on Counsel drafting applications re section 8. I drafted Simon's original bail application and defence case statement well within the time limits. All other requests to vary bail I have made. Due to the number of bail variations Simon is aware of the process and trying to get the variations agreed administratively. He is also aware of the attitude if the Court to his case the issues regarding Simon's case when I am on leave, I have no control over. Simon himself caused problems in this case by

(a) his behaviour on arrest

(b) his comments to police when the police were at his house re the number of items bought as a job lot. There was no evidence of this apart from what came from Simon himself.

(c) The gazebo in his garden was easily dealt with as he had the original receipt

(d) Simon ignoring legal advice in his interviews

(e) Simon's inaccurate interpretation on the law on burglary and what squatters can and cannot do whilst squatting in a building. There is a risk that Simon will be convicted in this case and this is not through the fault of Michael Carroll & Co or my representation but through his own conduct on his arrest and at the police station. To try to blame other people for the position he finds himself in is very wrong. Simple questions to consider:

1. Did the police know about or have any evidence re the job lot answer No until Simon himself revealed this

2. Could Simon explain his DNA in a moveable object answer. Yes, and he would have achieved the same result as Naomi

3. Could police prove the Venice chair came from warehouse no.

Information on this again came from Simon

4. Is Mohammed likely to be a witness as to sale of the items?

454,

If Simon had not made such foolish comments when he was arrested and instead followed sound legal advice at the police station then we could have made representations to review the case but based on his admissions at his address, coupled with his interview this was impossible. At the start of this case Simon was very much mistaken with regards to the law. Tactics and timing are important in cases. Simon does not want to allow Solicitors to make tactical decisions so the best of luck to him. Once I get an email back from Jemi re the conference and section 8 application I will be listing this case to have the legal representation order revoked. During the telephone conversation today Simon again was abusive, he questioned my professional integrity, my ability to defend my clients and he threatened to slander my name. I heard him loud and clear Lorraine. All I can say is he has a very short memory. I know exactly how many times I have represented Simon and how many of those cases have resulted in a charge or a conviction. I am duty solicitor at court tomorrow and I will email Jemi in the morning. I will request an urgent response from him, and I will then let you know when the case will be listed.

Kind regards

Josephine

Hi Josey

16/12/2013

13/12/2013

the barrister new nothing about the case and asked Simon to explain what his case was about. While Simon was explaining his barrister told Simon not to rush, Simon showed the barrister the invoices for the case and the barrister said these invoices were hear say, can he prove the items were even in the building at the time Simon was there. The Barrister asked where the disclosure, as what we showed him was rubbish. We had most of the case files with us that you had emailed to us. The Barrister asked has a section 8- and Third-Party Disclosure been put in, we told him no he said as soon as we get back get your solicitors to put a section 8- and Third-Party Disclosure in it should have been done already don’t delay get it done today. Solicitors aren't doing the job properly get onto them. The Barrister asked when is this in court we said next week, to which he said I don’t even know why you've been sent to me for this meeting as I’m on another case until Tuesday, Wednesday so won’t be able to represent you. The barrister also told me to get a copy of my interview tapes and go over them and mark any part that is wrong on the crowns paperwork. Simon had about a 20 min with his barrister before the barrister had to go back into court.

455,

When an application for a Section 8- and Third-Party Disclosure was put into the court on the

19/12/2013

there was a time given that Simon solicitor had till the

16/01/2014

to submit the section 8 and the Third-Party Disclosure to the court. And that then the crown had until the

16/02/2014

to give the information that had been requested. If the crown failed to give the information the case would need to be relisted in court so this could be address. As of today’s, date

02/02/2014

we still do not know if the section 8 and the Third-Party Disclosure has been given to the court. The last email from you on this subject was dated the

27/01/2014

where you told us that Jemi has drafted the section 8 applications that require minor amendments before it can be served. As for the Third-Party Disclosure as of

29/01/2014

13/12/2013

a call was made to Cunningham Lindsey where we talked to someone about the case for the insurance part of the claim, we were told that Nikki Diamond was not due back into the office until the

16/12/2013.

On the

16/12/2013

On the

17/12/2013

08/01/2014

my mum made a call to Trevor Allaway to setup a meeting with him at my mum address this was set for the

13/01/2014

at 11am, when my mum spoke to Trevor Allaway, he told her that he will be being the complete file for the claim with him to the meeting. On the

13/01/2014

28/03/2014

17/02/2013

for the 1st claim

25/03/2013

for a 2nd claim

07/06/2013

for the 3rd claim

We were shocked there was in fact a next claim we knew nothing for the 25/03/2013, and also the date for the last claim of the

07/06/2013

when in fact Simon case was for the

04/05/2013

We asked Trevor Allaway why the claim for

17/02/2013

and the

25/03/2013

was not paid out he said we did not believe the claim was real.

456,

He also said that when someone takes out insurance, they have to put down the condition of the property, and they also believed a lot of the damage to the building was from an earlier date. Trevor Allaway also said that to get out solicitors to go and get a statement from Nikki Diamond as she would be a creditable witness for Simon. All this was explained to you with an email that was sent to you on the

13/01/2014

15/01/2014

and the

18/01/2014

18/01/2014.

On the

21/01/2014

my mum emailed you about the application for my curfew for my birthday, you replied to this asking for his plains for his birthday so you could put the application into the court. On the

22/01/2014

24/01/2014

my mum late on the

24/01/2014

emailed you and texted you to get an update as to the application. There was no reply to this from you until the

27/01/2014

where you told us, the application could not be put in due the notice you need to give the court.

19/12/2014

when the application was heard for the section 8- and Third-Party Disclosure. So why was this only being address on

27/01/2014

when this then had already passed the date of the

16/01/2014

to hand the application into the court?

I feel this delay will again make my case take longer as there is still going to be a time given by the court to the crown to reply to the applications. On the

29/01/2013

a reply was made by email from my mum. Explaining parts in the letter that you attached to the email you sent on the

27/01/2014

for Nikki Diamond about the discloser of the file was not correct and needed amended. She also wrote that I still wanted a statement taken from Nikki Diamond due to this helping my case.

You replied to this email on the

29/01/2014

19/01/2013

23/12/2013

457,

advised to call my solicitor and ask them to relist the case for the

24/12/2013

On the

24/12/2013

I went to court and my mum come with me, when we got there, we were told the case was not listed before 11am. So we waited at the court at around 10.50 as a barrister had not turned up for me my mum texted for to ask the name of the barrister that would be coming that we were outside court 7 waiting, there was no reply to this text so at around 11.10 I made a call to the office and spoke to someone there that told me a barrister would not be attending, I was really upset with this but what could I say. I then saw the usher of the court and told her what was going on, she said why had the solicitors told me to come here and yet new there would not be a barrister and not tell me this beforehand, she told me she would talk to the crown who was in the court room and explain to him what was going on and then let me know what could be done. About 5 mins later she came out of the court room and told me that the crown was going to call it on and see what could be done. It was called into court and when the judge heard I did not have a barrister she asked the clerk of the court to call the office and see what was going on, which the clerk on the court did, when she got off the phone, she told the judge no one was coming to the court for me. I stood up and tried to explain to the judge what had gone on. My mum at this asked the judge if she could explain it and the judge said yes to come forward, she could hear what my mum was saying. My mum explained to the judge about the

19/12/2013

and the

23/12/2013

the judge was at lose of what could be done as the rule that had been made on the

23/01/2014

01/01/2014

03/01/2014

I asked my mum sent you an email to ask if my case was too much for you as I knew you had a lot of work on. You told me you were still on annual leave and I return to work on Monday. On the

31/01/2014

I was due to have a meeting in the office which you had to cancel as you were dealing with other cases. This was re booked for

04/01/2014

at 2pm. I have called you many times and it has just gone to voice mail and you have not called me back. I have also called the office about things I feel are wrong and told someone would call me back which has not happened. I can prove this with statements from the phones that were used. There are emails that have been sent to you and no reply to them emails and what I have asked to have been given. There was a break down before in this case as you are aware and I dropped the complaint. Josey, I have used you as a solicitor for many years and don’t just look at you as a solicitor you are a friend of the families. All I want is for my case to be dealt with in a correct manner, which will lead me to have a speedy and fair trial, and I don’t want to feel like I am being punished for a crime that I have not been convicted of. And I feel with the statement from Nikki Diamond that would show somewhat to Mr Patel ways in how he has dealt with his insurance case in this matter that clearly is not correct all ready. Could you please email back at the points that have been included in this email, and if you feel I am wrong on

458,

any points or the way in which I am feeling.

Simon

From: JOSEPHINE WARD [Mail To:josephinewardsolicitor@gmail.com]

Sent: 02 February 2014 14:31

To: too smooth; Lorraine Cordell

Subject: Simon Cordell application

to transfer legal representation

Simon

04th February 2014.

23rd December 2013

You telephoned me on a Sunday, reserved for emergency phone calls. You should have raised it back when you had the conference with Jemi. You have raised it now and I will deal with the

459,

accusations now. I await hearing from you by return email with regards to Jemi.

Regards

Josephine Ward

MICHAEL CARROLL & CO SOLICITIORS

The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue:

193. JOSEPHINE Ward _Simon Cordell_ (2)

/ Page Numbers: 460,

From: JOSEPHINE WARD [josephinewardsolicitor@gmail.com]

Sent: 03 February 2014 23:02

To: Lorraine Cordell

Subject: Simon Cordell

Lorraine

I am forwarding below Jemi's reply. I received this at 1.11pm. I am hoping to speak to Michael Carroll tomorrow afternoon in order to get his authorisation to apply to apply to court to get the legal representation order revoked. I will of course confirm the listing in due course.

Regards

Josephine

Utter nonsense, in every particular save that I could not do his case as then listed. Josie you know Simon has ADHDO and can get particularly anxious. I know that makes hard work, but I seem to be able to cooperate with him. If you wish, I'll call him and see if we can extend that cooperation and respect to all his representatives.

Jemi

Sent from my iPhone

The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue:

19 JOSEPHINE Ward_ Simon Cordell

/ Page Numbers: 68

Sent: 03 February 2014 22:57

To: Lorraine Cordell

Subject: Fwd.: Simon Cordell

Hi Lorraine

This is the email that I sent to Jemi this morning. I have been at court all day and then at Edmonton Police Station until 9pm and so I could not reply before now.

Regards

Josephine

Forwarded message from:

JOSEPHINE WARD <josephinewardsolicitor@gmail.com>

Date: Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 10:39 AM

Subject: Simon Cordell

To: "J. B. AkinOlugbade"

<j.akinolugbade@nexuschambers.com>

Del Edgeler

<Del.Edgeler@nexuschambers.com>

Hi Jemi

Mr Cordell telephoned my office and stated that he discussed his case with him on

13/12/2013

13th December 2013.

He made the following allegations:

1. You told him you could not do his case as you were dealing with a murder and you did not know

why we had instructed you or why you were having a conference

2. We had not forwarded any case papers to you

3. We should have put in the section 8 application and Third-Party Disclosure application and because we had not done this the client states that you advised him, we were not taking his case seriously and you recommended he change solicitors. I do not for one minute believe the accusations made but if you can please just confirm the position before I apply to court to revoke the legal representation order. If you can respond as a matter of urgency, I would be grateful and please forward the amended section 8 application so he can represent himself.

Thank you.

Josephine

Si Note:

Disrepair!

I get trapped and left in an uncaring environment not fit for any human at this present stage of my life by my landlords and this continues in reflection to the ongoing issues raised of concern in motion towards the Damp, Sound problems and the Heating not getting managed as the tenancy agreements quotes must get up kept by themselves!

Time Spent Building;

My mother also continues to work on building my company website for me with others at the Time Start: 09:00 and Time End: 14:00!

Working at Home doing Court Case Defence Work!

I spent time and resources costing expenditure with my mother also building my defence case, against the allegations getting put against me at the Time Start: 12:00 Am and Time End: 06:00 Am!

04/02/2014

Stuck on bail at my Own Home Address again for the Woolwich Crown Court Case!

Building the catalogue with Josh!

Issues with Housing Disrepair!

Working on My Website!

With Partner Two!

04/02/2014

· Disrepair!

· 1st Curfew!

· The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue:

194. JOSEPHINE Ward _Simon Cordell_ (3) /

Page Numbers: 461

Simon's Solicitor complaint - Application to transfer legal representation

Gazebo Case!

· The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue:

195. Lorraine Cordell _Re_ Simon Cordell_ (62) /

Page Numbers: 462

Simon's Solicitor complaint - Application to transfer legal representation

Gazebo Case!

· The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue:

196. JOSEPHINE WARD _RE_ Simon Cordell /

Page Numbers: 463,464,465

Simon's Solicitor complaint - Application to transfer legal representation

Gazebo Case!

The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue:

194. JOSEPHINE Ward _Simon Cordell_ (3)

/ Page Numbers: 461,

From: JOSEPHINE WARD [josephinewardsolicitor@gmail.com]

Sent: 03 February 2014 23:04

To: Lorraine Cordell

Subject: Simon Cordell

Lorraine

By way of update I am still awaiting the amended section 8 application from Jemi and no reply from Nikki Diamond to the email that I sent her.

Regards

Josephine

The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue:

195. Lorraine Cordell _Re_ Simon Cordell_ (62)

/ Page Numbers: 462,

From: Lorraine Cordell [lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk]

Sent: 04 February 2014 01:41

To: 'JOSEPHINE WARD'

Subject: RE: Simon Cordell

Hi Josey

Simon has asked me to email you and ask if his legal aid is to be revoked can it be transferred to a new solicitor rather then you revoke it. Simon has asked me to say he has stayed with Michael Carroll & Co since he was 14 years old and feels also that due this case being dealt with emails for the 1st time it has highlighted some of the problems that have been sent in the emails before, such as things not being put in time as said by the judge. And all he has asked is for his case to be death with in a timely and professional manner. At no time did he say anything about your professional integrity and made slanderous threats towards you as a person. As for what has been said from yourself to Jemi and Jemi reply I feel you have taken my words out of context and not used what you asked me for which was an email with a statement of what was said.

Simon.

From: JOSEPHINE WARD [Mail To:josephinewardsolicitor@gmail.com]

Sent: 03 February 2014 23:02

To: Lorraine Cordell

Subject: Simon Cordell

Lorraine

Regards

Josephine

Jemi Sent from my iPhone

The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue:

196. JOSEPHINE WARD _RE_ Simon Cordell

/ Page Numbers: 463,464,465,

From: JOSEPHINE WARD [josephinewardsolicitor@gmail.com]

Sent: 04 February 2014 07:48

To: Lorraine Cordell

Subject: RE: Simon Cordell

Lorraine

Simon was very clear in what he said on the phone re his meeting with Jemi. I did not misinterpret or misquote what he said. He also told me I was a bad solicitor and he did make the threat to publicise how I was dealing with him on Facebook because I clearly heard you tell him "No you are not". My interpretation of you saying this is that you knew he had gone too far by the threats he had issued. "All that he wants is to be dealt with in a timely and professional manner" really Lorraine, but you state Simon is not casting aspersions on my professional integrity. Re the timely manner Simon's main complaint is that his bail was not varied again specific instructions not provided when requested and Third-Party Disclosure. The trial is in June. Both the Third-Party Disclosure and section 8 application would be dealt with at the same time. I started dealing with Simon when he was 16. I observed Michael when Simon was accused of committing a robbery in the lifts at Edmonton Green. Simon was wearing a yellow coat and you a navy and cream ski type coat. A care worker was in the interview with him also. Units I think so nothing wrong with my recollection. Identification parades took place. I recall the police sending him a birthday card shortly after that to mark the occasion of his 17th birthday so he would not require an appropriate adult. Simon has been represented by Michael Carroll & Co and me personally always to a high standard. My track record as a criminal defence solicitor attest to this. In 15 years, I have successfully defended a number of very serious cases. I know how to make correct tactical decisions for clients. I should not have to defend my reputation to either Simon or you as you both know very well from past experiences how hard I try for people I am perfectly within my rights to ask for legal representation to be revoked in this case but because of the length of time I have known both you and Simon I will suggest to the court a transfer of legal representation on the ground of breakdown in relationship and the client alleging breakdown in trust and confidence in solicitor. I am at HMP Belmarsh this morning I will try to speak to Michael Carroll on the phone so he can authorise this. Best of luck to both you and Simon. You have all the case papers already. Anything you do not have copies of email me in a list. Please confirm details of the solicitor who you wish to transfer the case over to at your earliest convenience.

Josephine

On Feb 4, 2014 1:41 AM, "Lorraine Cordell" <lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:

Hi Josey

Simon has asked me to email you and ask if his legal aid is to be revoked can it be transferred to a new solicitor rather then you revoke it. Simon has asked me to say he has stayed with Michael Carroll & Co since he was 14 years old and feels also that due this case being dealt with emails for the 1st time it has highlighted some of the problems that have been sent in the emails before, such as things not being put in time as said by the judge.

464,

And all he has asked is for his case to be death with in a timely and professional manner. At no time did he say anything about your professional integrity and made slanderous threats towards you as a person. As for what has been said from yourself to Jemi and Jemi reply I feel you have taken my words out of context and not used what you asked me for which was an email with a statement of what was said.

Simon.

From: JOSEPHINE WARD [Mail To:josephinewardsolicitor@gmail.com]

Sent: 03 February 2014 23:02

To: Lorraine Cordell

Subject: Simon Cordell

Lorraine

Regards

Josephine

Utter nonsense, in every particular save that I could not do his case as then listed.

465,

Josie you know Simon has ADHDO and can get particularly anxious. I know that makes hard work, but I seem to be able to cooperate with him. If you wish, I'll call him and see if we can extend that cooperation and respect to all his representatives.

Jemi

Sent from my iPhone

Si Note:

Disrepair!

The uncaring attitudes that I get faced with from the Enfield Home and the Enfield Council departments is unacceptable and causes me to stay cold each day and night in my rented home at no fault of my own.

Time Spent Building;

My mother also continues to work on building my company website for me with others at the Time Start: 09:00 and Time End: 14:00!

Working at Home doing Court Case Defence Work!

I spent time and resources costing expenditure with my mother also building my defence case, against the allegations getting put against me at the Time Start: 12:00 Am and Time End: 06:00 Am!

05/02/2014

Stuck on bail at my Own Home Address again for the Woolwich Crown Court Case!

Building the catalogue with Josh!

Issues with Housing Disrepair!

Working on My Website!

With Partner Two!

05/02/2014

· Disrepair!

· 1st Curfew!

· The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue:

197. JOSEPHINE Ward _Request for mobile telephone number /

Page Numbers: 466,

Tyrone

Simon's Solicitor complaint - Application to transfer legal representation

Gazebo Case!

The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue:

197. JOSEPHINE Ward _Request for mobile telephone number

/ Page Numbers: 466,

From: JOSEPHINE WARD [josephinewardsolicitor@gmail.com]

Sent: 05 February 2014 20:21

To: Lorraine Cordell

Subject: Request for mobile telephone number

Lorraine

I have lost all my telephone contacts as my smart phone has died. Can you please email me your telephone number and Tyrone's please?

I have also asked Jemi he can still do the case, but you will probably have to tell the new solicitors that he is your preferred barrister. If you give them my contact details, I can email over all the information etc.

Regards

Josephine

Si Note:

Disrepair!

Enfield Council and the Enfield Homes response towards the housing disrepair problems that still do not get managed in a timely manner, showing my health a complete disregard for moral business practices, and by this happening them making my safety suffer due to their staff’s uninterested and reckless neglect off their behaviour!

Time Spent Building;

In the background of everything going on I finished working on Creating a new and up to date event Contingency Plan and I continued to Study and finish at the Time Start: 07:00 Am and Time End: 03:30 Pm!

My mother also continues to work on building my company website for me with others at the Time Start: 09:00 and Time End: 14:00!

Working at Home doing Court Case Defence Work!

I spent time and resources costing expenditure with my mother also building my defence case, against the allegations getting put against me at the Time Start: 12:00 Am and Time End: 06:00 Am!

06/02/2014

Stuck on bail at my Own Home Address again for the Woolwich Crown Court Case!

Building the catalogue with Josh!

Issues with Housing Disrepair!

Working on My Website!

With Partner Two!

06/02/2014

· Disrepair!

· 1st Curfew!

Disrepair!

As the days and night continue to hurry and go bye to the next day and night, I realise how irresponsible the Enfield Councils and the Enfield Homes treat their clientele, because I continue to express that I am ready and able to book a date in my diary to give their staff there rights towards their duties of contract the needed access to my property to complete the urgently needed repairs, so for them to get completed, with efficiency, but to my disadvantage I get left helpless by no correct follow ups!

Time Spent Building;

In the background of everything going on I started working on Creating a new and up to date Index of the Too Smooth Entertainment Health & Safety Policy Licensee’s Statement and Contents and I continued to Study and finish at the Time Start: 07:00 Am and Time End: 03:30 Pm!

My mother also continues to work on building my company website for me with others at the Time Start: 09:00 and Time End: 14:00!

Working at Home doing Court Case Defence Work!

I spent time and resources costing expenditure with my mother also building my defence case, against the allegations getting put against me at the Time Start: 12:00 Am and Time End: 06:00 Am!

07/02/2014

Stuck on bail at my Own Home Address again for the Woolwich Crown Court Case!

Building the catalogue with Josh!

Issues with Housing Disrepair!

Working on My Website!

With Partner Two!

07/02/2014

· Disrepair!

· 1st Curfew!

Disrepair!

The housing conditions continue to be outrageousness for human inhabitants due to the neglect of the Enfield homes neglect of contracts!

Time Spent Building;

In the background of everything going on I continued working on Creating a new and up to date Index of the Too Smooth Entertainment Health & Safety Policy Licensee’s and amending the Statement and Contents and I continued to Study and finish at the Time Start: 07:00 Am and Time End: 03:30 Pm!

My mother also continues to work on building my company website for me with others at the Time Start: 09:00 and Time End: 14:00!

Working at Home doing Court Case Defence Work!

I spent time and resources costing expenditure with my mother also building my defence case, against the allegations getting put against me at the Time Start: 12:00 Am and Time End: 06:00 Am!

08/02/2014

Stuck on bail at my Own Home Address again for the Woolwich Crown Court Case!

Building the catalogue with Josh!

Issues with Housing Disrepair!

Working on My Website!

With Partner Two!

08/02/2014

· Disrepair!

· 1st Curfew!

Disrepair!

I keep trying to provoke the correct actions to get met f the Enfield Council and the Enfield Homes teams!

Time Spent Building;

My mother also continues to work on building my company website for me with others at the Time Start: 09:00 and Time End: 14:00!

Working at Home doing Court Case Defence Work!

I spent time and resources costing expenditure with my mother also building my defence case, against the allegations getting put against me at the Time Start: 12:00 Am and Time End: 06:00 Am!

09/02/2014

Stuck on bail at my Own Home Address again for the Woolwich Crown Court Case!

Building the catalogue with Josh!

Issues with Housing Disrepair!

Working on My Website!

With Partner Two!

09/02/2014

· Disrepair!

· 1st Curfew!

Disrepair!

The flat, smells and looks shameful to live in due to the damp conditions, to further the disadvantage that I get to live in every time I pay for paint and wallpaper to upkeep my living standards, I get faced with the same bills from disrepair a couple of months’ latter once again!

Time Spent Building;

My mother also continues to work on building my company website for me with others at the Time Start: 09:00 and Time End: 14:00!

Working at Home doing Court Case Defence Work!

I spent time and resources costing expenditure with my mother also building my defence case, against the allegations getting put against me at the Time Start: 12:00 Am and Time End: 06:00 Am!

10/02/2014

Stuck on bail at my Own Home Address again for the Woolwich Crown Court Case!

Building the catalogue with Josh!

Issues with Housing Disrepair!

Working on My Website!

With Partner Two!

10/02/2014

· Disrepair!

· 1st Curfew!

· The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue:

198. Lorraine Cordell _Re_ Request for mobile telephone number_ (1)

/ Page Numbers: 467

Tyrone

Simon's Solicitor complaint - Application to transfer legal representation

Gazebo Case!

The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue:

198. Lorraine Cordell _Re_ Request for mobile telephone number_ (1)

/ Page Numbers: 467,

From: Lorraine Cordell [lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk]

Sent: 10 February 2014 12:15

To: 'JOSEPHINE WARD'

Subject: RE: Request for mobile telephone number

Hi Josey

Sorry it’s taken me a while to reply I have not been well, my home phone number is 0208 245 7454 and my other mob is 07807333545 Tyrone mob is 07572600589, as for the new Solicitor details Simon is seeing a Solicitor today so is not sure yet if they will take the case on until after the meeting. If they are going to do so I will send over later today the information. Also I am contacting the City Of London Magistrates court today due to the failure to surrender for his bail, as you are aware that this should not be on Simon PNC and I have spoken to you before about this many times, and the court a long while back and they said they was going to put it right and have not done so. You have always said not to worry about this on his PNC, yet they are using this so to impose more bail conditions on this case due to failure to surrender. I am going to try and get this sorted as they are holding this against Simon and have done so more than once so I do feel this does needs addressing and not left any longer.

Lorraine

From: JOSEPHINE WARD [Mail To:josephinewardsolicitor@gmail.com]

Sent: 05 February 2014 20:21

To: Lorraine Cordell

Subject: Request for mobile telephone number

Lorraine

I have lost all my telephone contacts as my smart phone has died. Can you please email me your telephone number and Tyrone's please?

Regards

Josephine

Si Note:

Disrepair!

The negligence of the duty of care for my life inflames the problems to arise have gone past shocking and for sure have now arisen to being dangers towards my well-being!

Time Spent Building;

My mother also continues to work on building my company website for me with others at the Time Start: 09:00 and Time End: 14:00!

Working at Home doing Court Case Defence Work!

I spent time and resources costing expenditure with my mother also building my defence case, against the allegations getting put against me at the Time Start: 12:00 Am and Time End: 06:00 Am!

11/02/2014

Stuck on bail at my Own Home Address again for the Woolwich Crown Court Case!

Building the catalogue with Josh!

Issues with Housing Disrepair!

Working on My Website!

With Partner Two!

11/02/2014

· Disrepair!

· 1st Curfew!

· The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue:

199. JOSEPHINE Ward _Re_ Request for mobile telephone number /

Page Numbers: 468,469

Simon's Solicitor complaint - Application to transfer legal representation

Gazebo Case!

· The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue:

200. Lorraine Cordell _Re_ Request for mobile telephone number /

Page Numbers: 470,471

Simon's Solicitor complaint - Application to transfer legal representation

Gazebo Case!

· The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue:

11 Feb 2014 at /

Page Numbers: 472,473,474,475

My Company Too Smooth!

The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue:

199. JOSEPHINE Ward _Re_ Request for mobile telephone number

/ Page Numbers: 468,469,

From: JOSEPHINE WARD [josephinewardsolicitor@gmail.com]

Sent: 11 February 2014 10:06

To: Lorraine Cordell

Subject: Re: Request for mobile telephone number

Hi Lorraine

Can you please confirm the details of Simon's new solicitor so that I can apply to get his case listed so that the transfer can proceed?

Regards

Josephine

PS Thanks for the contact details of yourself and Tyrone

On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 12:14 PM, Lorraine Cordell <lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:

Hi Josey

Sorry it’s taken me a while to reply I have not been well; my home phone number is 0208 245 7454 and my other mob is 07807333545 Tyrone mob is 07572600589, as for the new Solicitor details Simon is seeing a Solicitor today so is not sure yet if they will take the case on until after the meeting. If they are going to do so I will send over later today the information. Also I am contacting the City Of London Magistrates court today due to the failure to surrender for his bail, as you are aware that this should not be on Simon PNC and I have spoken to you before about this many times, and the court a long while back and they said they was going to put it right and have not done so. You have always said not to worry about this on his PNC, yet they are using this so to impose more bail conditions on this case due to failure to surrender. I am going to try and get this sorted as they are holding this against Simon and have done so more than once so I do feel this does needs addressing and not left any longer.

Lorraine

From: JOSEPHINE WARD [Mail To:josephinewardsolicitor@gmail.com]

Sent: 05 February 2014 20:21

To: Lorraine Cordell

Subject: Request for mobile telephone number

Lorraine

469,

I have lost all my telephone contacts as my smart phone has died. Can you please email me your telephone number and Tyrone's please?

Regards

Josephine

The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue:

200. Lorraine Cordell _Re_ Request for mobile telephone number

/ Page Numbers: 470,471,

From: Lorraine Cordell [lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk]

Sent: 11 February 2014 17:47

To: 'JOSEPHINE WARD'

Subject: RE: Request for mobile telephone number

Hi Josey

Thank you for the email Simon went to see the solicitor yesterday and due to how far the case is they would not take it over he has a next meeting tomorrow with a next solicitor. Until he gets a solicitor, I cannot give you the details. I will update you tomorrow if he can’t get a solicitor, he will deal with it himself in court. Also, if Jemi has done the section 8 can you email that over and have you had a reply from Nikki Diamond as of yet. As Simon wants to get them into the court as soon as possible as it is already well past the date the judge said he will hand them in his self if needed.

Lorraine

From: JOSEPHINE WARD [Mail To:josephinewardsolicitor@gmail.com]

Sent: 11 February 2014 10:06

To: Lorraine Cordell

Subject: Re: Request for mobile telephone number

Hi Lorraine

Can you please confirm the details of Simon's new solicitor so that I can apply to get his case listed so that the transfer can proceed?

Regards

Josephine

PS Thanks for the contact details of yourself and Tyrone

On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 12:14 PM, Lorraine Cordell <lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:

Hi Josey

Lorraine

From: JOSEPHINE WARD [Mail To:josephinewardsolicitor@gmail.com]

Sent: 05 February 2014 20:21

To: Lorraine Cordell

Subject: Request for mobile telephone number

471,

Lorraine

I have lost all my telephone contacts as my smart phone has died. Can you please email me your telephone number and Tyrone's please?

I remember your old number 07961 833 021 but cannot remember the other one or your house number. I will hopefully list the case next week. Can you confirm the new Solicitor details at your earliest convenience? I have also asked Jemi he can still do the case, but you will probably have to tell the new solicitors that he is your preferred barrister. If you give them my contact details, I can email over all the information etc.

Regards

Josephine

The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue:

11 Feb 2014 at

/ Page Numbers: 472,473,474,475,

Enterprise Enfield News

From: Sue King (sking@enterpriseenfield.org)

To: re_wired@ymail.com

Date: Tuesday, 11 February 2014, 19:27 GMT

473,

“Information”

474,

“Information”

475,

“Information”

Si Note:

Disrepair!

The level of service provided by the Enfield Home and the Enfield Council departments when I deal with them is terrible, and in my case, I get disadvantage because of the neglect and. Intentional infliction of emotional distress that I get opposed towards by their staff! It is truly tragic that the Enfield Councils and the Enfield Homes inclusive of the Metropolitans constabulary left the occupiers of 117 Burncroft Avenue without any form of support in regards to their Child's protection when I notified them of my concerns and video evidence of the legal guardians consecutive while amoral behaviour of criminal attempts, as for the child protection Act 1989 states that in section 27 of that act it requires all local authority as a must to assist in the protection of children, since the young child's birth the child legal mother and father have provoked a Critical emergency needed for the Mental stability of themselves to get questioned as for the complete absinth of the disregard for life itself, as the Article 2 of the human Right Act 1998 explains within its context, as I am Confident that the child is in danger alongside many of my other witness towards the child’s legal guardians stability and Mental stability. The overseeing authorities should have contacted the Social Services the earliest opportunity in pursuit of the Social Workers Act 1981!

Time Spent Building;

My mother also continues to work on building my company website for me with others at the Time Start: 09:00 and Time End: 14:00!

Working at Home doing Court Case Defence Work!

I spent time and resources costing expenditure with my mother also building my defence case, against the allegations getting put against me at the Time Start: 12:00 Am and Time End: 06:00 Am!

12/02/2014

Westminster sent the memorandum of conviction as requested about the errors on my criminal record contained on the police national computer system!

Stuck on bail at my Own Home Address again for the Woolwich Crown Court Case!

Building the catalogue with Josh!

Issues with Housing Disrepair!

Working on My Website!

With Partner Two!

12/02/2014 to the 17/02/2014

· Disrepair!

· 1st Curfew!

· Errors on my;

PNC Record!

Criminal PNC

Doctors

· The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue:

202. JOSEPHINE Ward _Re_ Regina v_ (6) /

Page Numbers: 476,477

Gazebo Case!

· The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue:

204. JOSEPHINE Ward _Re_ Regina v_ (7) /

Page Numbers: 478,479,480

Gazebo Case!

· The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue:

205. JOSEPHINE Ward _Regina v_ (17) /

Page Numbers: 481

Gazebo Case!

· The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue:

206. JOSEPHINE Ward _Regina v_ (18) /

Page Numbers: 482

Gazebo Case!

· The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue:

207. Lorraine Cordell _Re_ Regina v_ (29) /

Page Numbers: 483

Gazebo Case!

· The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue:

208. Lorraine Cordell _Re_ Regina v_ (28) /

Page Numbers: 484

Gazebo Case!

· The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue:

209. JOSEPHINE Ward _Re_ Regina v_ (8) /

Page Numbers: 485,486,487

Gazebo Case!

· The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue:

210. Lorraine Cordell _Re_ Simon Cordell error on record /

Page Numbers: 488

Criminal PNC

· The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue:

211. JOSEPHINE WARD Legal Representation /

Page Numbers: 489

Gazebo Case!

· The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue:

212. Lorraine Cordell _Re_ Regina v_ (27) /

Page Numbers: 490,491

Gazebo Case!

· The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue:

213. Lorraine Cordell _Re_ Regina v_ (26) /

Page Numbers: 492,493,494

Gazebo Case!

· The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue:

214. Lorraine Cordell _Re_ Regina v_ (25) /

Page Numbers: 495,496,497

Gazebo Case!

· The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue:

23 JOSEPHINE Ward_ Regina v Simon Cordell CL ref 5005393 (Patel) /

Page Numbers: 73,74,75

Gazebo Case!

Errors on my PNC Record: --

On the

12/02/2014

Emails again got sent to westminster.gov@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk

regarding failing to surrender on my PNC, criminal Record. Westminster sent the memorandum of conviction via an email after my request to the courthouse; I received this email on the

17/02/2014

not too long after us paying for it. When I received the email, I acknowledged that it demonstrated what I claimed all about and that it was in error. The failing to surrender got dismissed by the court a long time beforehand, so it should have never of been placed on my PNC record and this error on my criminal record is why I got sent to prison, due to no fault of my own. I know it should not be on a copy of my Police Record, stating that I got found guilty of this offence. In understanding this error and knowing that many more were on my record to which I disputed knowledge about I continued in my search for answers; Then on the

19/02/2014

more Email’s got sent to another courthouse such as Highbury Corner Magistrates Court, to have all my PNC records checked, for cases that were heard by Enfield Court which Edmonton Police dealt with. This took time to address as there where a list of Records I wanted checked. While waiting for my replies from the courthouses regarding my criminal recorded being in error so I felt depressed because of all the ongoing in my life so I attend to the local doctors to explain how the police court case and bail conditions deterred, my life away from being in harmony.

The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue:

202. JOSEPHINE Ward _Re_ Regina v_ (6)

/ Page Numbers: 476,477,

From: JOSEPHINE WARD [josephinewardsolicitor@gmail.com]

Sent: 12 February 2014 12:17

To: Lorraine Cordell

Subject: Re: Regina v. Simon Cordell for mention at Woolwich Crown Court on

Attachments: SECTION 8 APPLICATION.pdf

Hi Lorraine

Trevor Allaway has indicated that he will view a section 35 request favourably. If he agrees that we satisfy the criteria of section 35 then we will not have to resort to Third Party Disclosure as he should disclose. We may still have to do Third Party disclosure if he redacts information that may be relevant. A decision cannot be made on this until we receive either

(a) the file from the insurance company or

(b) the insurance company is unwilling to disclose in which case Third party Disclosure kicks in again. The section 8 application was sent off today. I had asked Jemi to amend and he had not, so I amended it and sent it off. Lorraine as Simon's case is in the warned list there is no guarantee that he will get Jemi to do the trial. He is still booked to do the case, but this is dependent on other cases not over running or him being instructed in a weeklong case. Simon's conference with Jemi in December was a classic example of this. He was dealing with a child neglect case which over ran and had Simon's case been listed then Jemi would not have been able to do the case. Jemi or his Chambers may be willing to do the case. The court can direct that legal representation stay in place for the purposes of Counsel conducting Simon's trial and possibly for a pretrial conference, but their diaries change, and this affects their availability. I hope this clarifies.

Regards

Josephine

On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 11:59 AM, Lorraine Cordell <lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:

Hi Josey

Thank you for the update but I am not sure what the email means to Trevor Allaway. Does this mean they will?

give you the file without 3rd party?

Really not sure what it means.

Lorraine

From: JOSEPHINE WARD [Mail To:josephinewardsolicitor@gmail.com]

Sent: 12 February 2014 11:50

To: Lorraine Cordell; too smooth

Subject: Regina v. Simon Cordell for mention at Woolwich Crown Court on

477,

Dear Simon / Lorraine

Please note that your case is listed for mention at Woolwich Crown Court on

18th February 2014

The listing indicates that you must attend. Can you please confirm the details of your new solicitors in order that I can email the court and confirm that we do not object to the proposed transfer of legal representation?

If you cannot locate a Solicitor to take over the case then we can apply on this date to have legal representation revoked so that you can represent yourself, as you have indicated you wish to. I stress that legal representation still covers Counsel and in a case like this it is better to at least have representation from a barrister. The majority of the work has been done on this case and the only outstanding issues are as follows:

1. Disclosure from Insurance company

2. Disclosure requests in the defence case statement

3. Bad character skeleton argument to oppose Jemi will draft this as he will be arguing to exclude the bad character. In relation to 1 and 2 above the items disclosed will assist with cross examining witnesses. I have forwarded emails sent to the CPS, Woolwich Crown Court and also to Mr Trevor Allaway. If you have any further questions, then please do not hesitate to email me. I will still assist you with the preparation of the defence until legal representation is revoked or transferred.

Regards

Josephine

The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue:

204. JOSEPHINE Ward _Re_ Regina v_ (7)

/ Page Numbers: 478,479,480,

From: JOSEPHINE WARD [josephinewardsolicitor@gmail.com]

Sent: 12 February 2014 15:04

To: Lorraine Cordell

Subject: Re: Regina v. Simon Cordell for mention at Woolwich Crown Court on

Hi Lorraine

I have just returned from lunch. Tell Simon that is fine. I do not want to fall out with either him or you. He is hard work but I am still willing to represent him.

Regards

Josephine

On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 1:56 PM, Lorraine Cordell <lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:

Hi Josey

Thank you for the update I understand now as to the section 35. Simon has just got here as he is due to have a meeting at 3pm today with a next solicitor; he has read the emails and asked me to write this to you. If you are still willing represent him then he is fine with this, as he was only upset due to him believing things was not being done in time and him believing this would impact his life for longer. As he said the other day, he is sorry for the disagreement that happened on the phone. If you could let him know how you feel about this before 14.30, he would be grateful.

Simon / Lorraine

From: JOSEPHINE WARD [Mail To:josephinewardsolicitor@gmail.com]

Sent: 12 February 2014 12:17

To: Lorraine Cordell

Subject: Re: Regina v. Simon Cordell for mention at Woolwich Crown Court on

Hi Lorraine

Trevor Allaway has indicated that he will view a section 35 request favourably. If he agrees that we satisfy the criteria of section 35 then we will not have to resort to Third Party Disclosure as he

479,

should disclose. We may still have to do Third Party disclosure if he redacts information that may be relevant. A decision cannot be made on this until we receive either

(a) the file from the insurance company or

and this affects their availability.

I hope this clarifies.

Regards

Josephine

On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 11:59 AM, Lorraine Cordell <lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:

Hi Josey

Thank you for the update but I am not sure what the email means to Trevor Allaway. Does this mean they will give you the file without 3rd party?

Really not sure what it means.

Lorraine

From: JOSEPHINE WARD [Mail To:josephinewardsolicitor@gmail.com]

Sent: 12 February 2014 11:50

To: Lorraine Cordell; too smooth

Subject: Regina v. Simon Cordell for mention at Woolwich Crown Court on

Dear Simon / Lorraine

Please note that your case is listed for mention at Woolwich Crown Court on

18th February 2014.

If you cannot locate a Solicitor to take over the case then we can apply on this date to have legal representation revoked so that you can represent yourself, as you have indicated you wish to.

480,

I stress that legal representation still covers Counsel and in a case like this it is better to at least have representation from a barrister. The majority of the work has been done on this case and the only outstanding issues are as follows:

1. Disclosure from Insurance company

2. Disclosure requests in the defence case statement

Regards

Josephine

The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue:

205. JOSEPHINE Ward _Regina v_ (17)

/ Page Numbers: 481

From: JOSEPHINE WARD [josephinewardsolicitor@gmail.com]

Sent: 12 February 2014 11:43

To: croydonkingston&woolwichcrown@cps.gsi.gov.uk

listing@woolwich.crowncourt.gsi.gov.uk;

Lorraine Cordell; J.B. AkinOlugbade

Subject: Regina v. Simon Cordell for mention at Woolwich Crown Court on 18th February 2014

Attachments: SECTION 8 APPLICATION.pdf

Dear Sir or Madam

We continue to act on behalf of our above-named client under the terms of a legal representation order. We attach a copy of the section 8 application in relation to this matter. We apologise for the delay in serving this document. We await the disclosure in due course.

Yours faithfully

MICHAEL CARROLL & CO.

The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue:

206. JOSEPHINE Ward _Regina v_ (18)

/ Page Numbers: 482,

From: JOSEPHINE WARD [josephinewardsolicitor@gmail.com]

Sent: 12 February 2014 11:50

To: Lorraine Cordell; too smooth

Subject: Regina v. Simon Cordell for mention at Woolwich Crown Court on

Dear Simon / Lorraine

Please note that your case is listed for mention at Woolwich Crown Court on 18th February 2014. The listing indicates that you must attend. Can you please confirm the details of your new solicitors in order that I can email the court and confirm that we do not object to the proposed transfer of legal representation?

1. Disclosure from Insurance company

2. Disclosure requests in the defence case statement

Regards

Josephine

The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue:

207. Lorraine Cordell _Re_ Regina v_ (29)

/ Page Numbers: 483,

From: Lorraine Cordell [lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk]

Sent: 12 February 2014 12:00

To: 'JOSEPHINE WARD'

Subject: RE: Regina v. Simon Cordell for mention at Woolwich Crown Court on

Hi Josey

Thank you for the update but I am not sure what the email means to Trevor Allaway. Does this mean they will give you the file without 3rd party?

Really not sure what it means.

Lorraine

From: JOSEPHINE WARD [Mail To:josephinewardsolicitor@gmail.com]

Sent: 12 February 2014 11:50

To: Lorraine Cordell; too smooth

Subject: Regina v. Simon Cordell for mention at Woolwich Crown Court on

Dear Simon / Lorraine

1. Disclosure from Insurance company

2. Disclosure requests in the defence case statement

Regards

Josephine

The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue:

208. Lorraine Cordell _Re_ Regina v_ (28)

/ Page Numbers: 484,

From: Lorraine Cordell [lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk]

Sent: 12 February 2014 12:04

To: 'JOSEPHINE WARD'

Subject: RE: Regina v. Simon Cordell for mention at Woolwich Crown Court on

Hi Josey

Thank you for the update but I am not sure what the email means to Trevor Allaway. Does this mean they will give you the file without 3rd party?

Really not sure what it means. I also not sure what you mean about the Barrister if you revoke due to the how far this case has gone and no other solicitors will take the case on due to this does this mean Simon can still have Jemi as his barrister even if he doesn’t have a solicitor?

Sorry for the double email I forgot to add the part about the barrister in the last email.

Lorraine

From: JOSEPHINE WARD [Mail To:josephinewardsolicitor@gmail.com]

Sent: 12 February 2014 11:50

To: Lorraine Cordell; too smooth

Subject: Regina v. Simon Cordell for mention at Woolwich Crown Court on

Dear Simon / Lorraine

Please note that your case is listed for mention at Woolwich Crown Court on

18th February 2014

1. Disclosure from Insurance company

2. Disclosure requests in the defence case statement

Regards

Josephine

The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue:

209. JOSEPHINE Ward _Re_ Regina v_ (8)

/ Page Numbers: 485,486,487,

From: JOSEPHINE WARD [josephinewardsolicitor@gmail.com]

Sent: 12 February 2014 17:38

To: Lorraine Cordell

Subject: Re: Regina v. Simon Cordell for mention at Woolwich Crown Court on

Hi Lorraine

Just so that we are both clear Simons wants me to continue to represent him. Please confirm.

Regards

Josephine

On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 5:24 PM, Lorraine Cordell <lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:

Hi Josey

Simon said thank you.

Lorraine

From: JOSEPHINE WARD [Mail To:josephinewardsolicitor@gmail.com]

Sent: 12 February 2014 15:04

To: Lorraine Cordell

Subject: Re: Regina v. Simon Cordell for mention at Woolwich Crown Court on

Hi Lorraine

I have just returned from lunch. Tell Simon that is fine. I do not want to fall out with either him or you. He is hard work but I am still willing to represent him.

Regards

Josephine

On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 1:56 PM, Lorraine Cordell <lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:

Hi Josey

486,

this to you. If you are still willing represent him then he is fine with this, as he was only upset due to him believing things was not being done in time and him believing this would impact his life for longer. As he said the other day, he is sorry for the disagreement that happened on the phone. If you could let him know how you feel about this before 14.30, he would be grateful.

Simon / Lorraine

From: JOSEPHINE WARD [Mail To:josephinewardsolicitor@gmail.com]

Sent: 12 February 2014 12:17

To: Lorraine Cordell

Subject: Re: Regina v. Simon Cordell for mention at Woolwich Crown Court on

Hi Lorraine

(a) the file from the insurance company or

(b) the insurance company is unwilling to disclose in which case Third party Disclosure kicks in again.

The section 8 application was sent off today. I had asked Jemi to amend and he had not, so I amended it and sent it off. Lorraine as Simon's case is in the warned list there is no guarantee that he will get Jemi to do the trial. He is still booked to do the case, but this is dependent on other cases not over running or him being instructed in a weeklong case. Simon's conference with Jemi in December was a classic example of this. He was dealing with a child neglect case which over ran and had Simon's case been listed then Jemi would not have been able to do the case. Jemi or his Chambers may be willing to do the case. The court can direct that legal representation stay in place for the purposes of Counsel conducting Simon's trial and possibly for a pretrial conference, but their diaries change and this affects their availability. I hope this clarifies.

Regards

Josephine

487,

On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 11:59 AM, Lorraine Cordell <lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:

Hi Josey

Thank you for the update but I am not sure what the email means to Trevor Allaway. Does this mean they will give you the file without 3rd party?

Really not sure what it means.

Lorraine

From: JOSEPHINE WARD [Mail To:josephinewardsolicitor@gmail.com]

Sent: 12 February 2014 11:50

To: Lorraine Cordell; too smooth

Subject: Regina v. Simon Cordell for mention at Woolwich Crown Court on

Dear Simon / Lorraine

Please note that your case is listed for mention at Woolwich Crown Court on

18th February 2014.

1. Disclosure from Insurance company

2. Disclosure requests in the defence case statement

Regards

Josephine

The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue:

210. Lorraine Cordell _Re_ Simon Cordell error on record

/ Page Numbers: 488,

From: Lorraine Cordell [lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk]

Sent: 12 February 2014 12:45

To: 'westminster.mc@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk'

Subject: Re: Simon Cordell error on record.

Attachments: PCN City London.pdf

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing this email after a call that was made to the City of London Magistrate Court on the

10/02/2014

about a list that is on my PNC that is incorrect. I was told to write this email including as much information as I could to get this updated. I have contacted you a few times before about this Error on my PCN and was told that you would get it updated but as of now this has never been done. I was told on the

10/02/2014

when I called due to the date that it would be down to the police to update this. You would have only forwarded the information to the police to get this updated. The Error is for a case that was heard on the

03/03/2008

at the City of London Magistrate Court, for failing to surrender to custody at appointed time, on the

25/01/08.

The error is that I did not go to go but my mum called the court and a sick note was handed to the court and the case was dismissed, so should not be on my record. This has caused me problems with bail on a few times and this is why calls have been made before to the court, at this time it has been causing me problems again with a case I am at Woolwich Crown court for. I have attached the page for the PNC print out the police did for the case at Woolwich crown court that I am on bail now for. This print out was done by the police on or around the

26 June 2013

for the Woolwich case. I do feel this is causing me problems with my bail and I am therefore asking for this to be dealt with as fast as possible in order that I can show the court this should in fact not be on my record. I was told on the

10/02/2014

when I called that if I ask for a court transcript that this could be done faster than updating the PNC records and I would be able to show the Judge at Woolwich crown court the court transcript for the case that is on my file in error and that should be enough to prove that it should not be on my record. I am there for asking for the court transcript to be sent to me if there are costs for this please email me back with the cost for this to be sent to me and I will get this paid to the court. Please see attached file for the page in my PNC record which is there in error I have highlighted the case. If this can be done as a matter of urgency due to the impact this is having on my life.

Many Thanks

Mr Simon Cordell

DOB 26/01/1981

The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue:

211. JOSEPHINE WARD Legal Representation

/ Page Numbers: 489,

From: JOSEPHINE WARD [josephinewardsolicitor@gmail.com]

Sent: 12 February 2014 13:12

To: too smooth; Lorraine Cordell

Subject: Legal Representation

Lorraine

Just by way of update, neither Jemi nor any other Counsel will deal with Simon's case without a solicitor being instructed.

Regards

Josephine

The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue:

212. Lorraine Cordell _Re_ Regina v_ (27)

/ Page Numbers: 490,491,

From: Lorraine Cordell [lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk]

Sent: 12 February 2014 13:56

To: 'JOSEPHINE WARD'

Subject: RE: Regina v. Simon Cordell for mention at Woolwich Crown Court on

Hi Josey

Simon / Lorraine

From: JOSEPHINE WARD [Mail To:josephinewardsolicitor@gmail.com]

Sent: 12 February 2014 12:17

To: Lorraine Cordell

Subject: Re: Regina v. Simon Cordell for mention at Woolwich Crown Court on

Hi Lorraine

(a) the file from the insurance company or

Lorraine as Simon's case is in the warned list there is no guarantee that he will get Jemi to do the trial. He is still booked to do the case, but this is dependent on other cases not over running or him being instructed in a weeklong case. Simon's conference with Jemi in December was a classic example of this. He was dealing with a child neglect case which over ran and had Simon's case been listed then Jemi would not have been able to do the case. Jemi or his Chambers may be willing to do the case. The court can direct that legal representation stay in place for the purposes of Counsel conducting Simon's trial and possibly for a pretrial conference, but their diaries change, and this affects their availability.

I hope this clarifies.

Regards

Josephine

On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 11:59 AM, Lorraine Cordell <lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:

491,

Hi Josey

Thank you for the update but I am not sure what the email means to Trevor Allaway. Does this mean they will give you the file without 3rd party?

Really not sure what it means.

Lorraine

From: JOSEPHINE WARD [Mail To:josephinewardsolicitor@gmail.com]

Sent: 12 February 2014 11:50

To: Lorraine Cordell; too smooth

Subject: Regina v. Simon Cordell for mention at Woolwich Crown Court on

Dear Simon / Lorraine

Please note that your case is listed for mention at Woolwich Crown Court on

18th February 2014

If you cannot locate a Solicitor to take over the case then we can apply on this date to have legal representation revoked so that you can represent yourself, as you have indicated you wish to.

1. Disclosure from Insurance company

2. Disclosure requests in the defence case statement

Regards

Josephine

The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue:

213. Lorraine Cordell _Re_ Regina v_ (26)

/ Page Numbers: 492,493,494,

From: Lorraine Cordell [lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk]

Sent: 12 February 2014 17:25

To: 'JOSEPHINE WARD'

Subject: RE: Regina v. Simon Cordell for mention at Woolwich Crown Court on

Hi Josey

Simon said thank you.

Lorraine

From: JOSEPHINE WARD [Mail To:josephinewardsolicitor@gmail.com]

Sent: 12 February 2014 15:04

To: Lorraine Cordell

Subject: Re: Regina v. Simon Cordell for mention at Woolwich Crown Court on

Hi Lorraine

I have just returned from lunch. Tell Simon that is fine. I do not want to fall out with either him or you. He is hard work but I am still willing to represent him.

Regards

Josephine

On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 1:56 PM, Lorraine Cordell <lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:

Hi Josey

Simon / Lorraine

From: JOSEPHINE WARD [Mail To:josephinewardsolicitor@gmail.com]

Sent: 12 February 2014 12:17

To: Lorraine Cordell

Subject: Re: Regina v. Simon Cordell for mention at Woolwich Crown Court on

Hi Lorraine

(a) the file from the insurance

company or

(b) the insurance company is unwilling to disclose in which case Third party Disclosure

493,

kicks in again. The section 8 application was sent off today. I had asked Jemi to amend and he had not, so I amended it and sent it off. Lorraine as Simon's case is in the warned list there is no guarantee that he will get Jemi to do the trial. He is still booked to do the case, but this is dependent on other cases not over running or him being instructed in a weeklong case. Simon's conference with Jemi in December was a classic example of this. He was dealing with a child neglect case which over ran and had Simon's case been listed then Jemi would not have been able to do the case. Jemi or his Chambers may be willing to do the case. The court can direct that legal representation stay in place for the purposes of Counsel conducting Simon's trial and possibly for a pretrial conference, but their diaries change and this affects their availability. I hope this clarifies.

Regards

Josephine

On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 11:59 AM, Lorraine Cordell <lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:

Hi Josey

Thank you for the update but I am not sure what the email means to Trevor Allaway. Does this mean they will?

give you the file without 3rd party?

Really not sure what it means.

Lorraine

From: JOSEPHINE WARD [Mail To:josephinewardsolicitor@gmail.com]

Sent: 12 February 2014 11:50

To: Lorraine Cordell; too smooth

Subject: Regina v. Simon Cordell for mention at Woolwich Crown Court on

Dear Simon / Lorraine

Please note that your case is listed for mention at Woolwich Crown Court on

18th February 2014

The listing indicates that you must attend. Can you please confirm the details of your new solicitors?

in order that I can email the court and confirm that we do not object to the proposed transfer of legal representation. If you cannot locate a Solicitor to take over the case then we can apply on this date to have legal representation revoked so that you can represent yourself, as you have indicated you wish to. I stress that legal representation still covers Counsel and in a case like this it is better to at least have representation from a barrister. The majority of the work has been done on this case and the only outstanding issues are as follows:

1. Disclosure from Insurance company

2. Disclosure requests in the defence case statement

3. Bad character skeleton argument to oppose Jemi

will draft this as he will be arguing to exclude

the bad character. In relation to 1 and 2 above the items disclosed will assist with cross examining witnesses.

I have forwarded emails sent to the CPS, Woolwich Crown Court and also to Mr. Trevor Allaway. If

494,

you have any further questions then please do not hesitate to email me. I will still assist you with the preparation of the defence until legal representation is revoked or transferred.

Regards

Josephine

The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue:

214. Lorraine Cordell _Re_ Regina v_ (25)

/ Page Numbers: 495,496,497,

From: Lorraine Cordell [lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk]

Sent: 12 February 2014 18:03

To: 'JOSEPHINE WARD'

Subject: RE: Regina v. Simon Cordell for mention at Woolwich Crown Court on

Hi Josey

Yes, that is what he wants for you to continue to represent him.

Lorraine

From: JOSEPHINE WARD [Mail To:josephinewardsolicitor@gmail.com]

Sent: 12 February 2014 17:38

To: Lorraine Cordell

Subject: Re: Regina v. Simon Cordell for mention at Woolwich Crown Court on

Hi Lorraine

Just so that we are both clear Simons wants me to continue to represent him. Please confirm.

Regards

Josephine

On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 5:24 PM, Lorraine Cordell <lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:

Hi Josey

Simon said thank you.

Lorraine

From: JOSEPHINE WARD [Mail To:josephinewardsolicitor@gmail.com]

Sent: 12 February 2014 15:04

To: Lorraine Cordell

Subject: Re: Regina v. Simon Cordell for mention at Woolwich Crown Court on

Hi Lorraine

I have just returned from lunch. Tell Simon that is fine. I do not want to fall out with either him or you. He is hard work but I am still willing to represent him.

Regards

Josephine

On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 1:56 PM, Lorraine Cordell <lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:

Hi Josey

496,

If you are still willing represent him then he is fine with this, as he was only upset due to him believing things was not being done in time and him believing this would impact his life for longer. As he said the other day, he is sorry for the disagreement that happened on the phone. If you could let him know how you feel about this before 14.30, he would be grateful.

Simon / Lorraine

From: JOSEPHINE WARD [Mail To:josephinewardsolicitor@gmail.com]

Sent: 12 February 2014 12:17

To: Lorraine Cordell

Subject: Re: Regina v. Simon Cordell for mention at Woolwich Crown Court on

Hi Lorraine

(a) the file from the insurance company or

(b) the insurance company is unwilling to disclose in which case Third party Disclosure kicks in again.

He is still booked to do the case, but this is dependent on other cases not over running or him being instructed in a weeklong case. Simon's conference with Jemi in December was a classic example of this. He was dealing with a child neglect case which over ran and had Simon's case been listed then Jemi would not have been able to do the case. Jemi or his Chambers may be willing to do the case. The court can direct that legal representation stay in place for the purposes of Counsel conducting Simon's trial and possibly for a pretrial conference, but their diaries change, and this affects them

availability.

I hope this clarifies.

Regards

Josephine

On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 11:59 AM, Lorraine Cordell <lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:

Hi Josey

Thank you for the update but I am not sure what the email means to Trevor Allaway. Does this mean they will give you the file without 3rd party?

Really not sure what it means.

Lorraine

From: JOSEPHINE WARD [Mail To:josephinewardsolicitor@gmail.com]

Sent: 12 February 2014 11:50

To: Lorraine Cordell; too smooth

Subject: Regina v. Simon Cordell for mention at Woolwich Crown Court on

497,

Dear Simon / Lorraine

Please note that your case is listed for mention at Woolwich Crown Court on 18th February 2014.

1. Disclosure from Insurance company

2. Disclosure requests in the defence case statement

Regards

Josephine

The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue:

23 JOSEPHINE Ward_ Regina v Simon Cordell CL ref 5005393 (Patel)

/ Page Numbers: 73,74,75

From: JOSEPHINE WARD [josephinewardsolicitor@gmail.com]

Sent: 12 February 2014 11:43

To: Lorraine Cordell; too smooth

Subject: Fwd.: Regina v Simon Cordell CL ref 5005393 (Patel)

Attachments: STATEMENT PATEL PART 2.pdf; INDICTMENT AND PATEL STATEMENT PT1.pdf

Lorraine / Simon

Please see forwarded email that I sent to Mr Trevor Allaway.

Regards

Josephine

Forwarded message from:

JOSEPHINE WARD <josephinewardsolicitor@gmail.com>

Date: Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 11:38 AM

Subject: Re: Regina v Simon Cordell CL ref 5005393 (Patel)

To: "Allaway, Trevor" <Trevor.Allaway@cluk.com>

Dear Mr Allaway

Thank you for your email.

This case is listed for mention at Woolwich Crown Court on

18th February 2014

It is my understanding that you have been contacted directly by Mr Simon Cordell and Miss Lorraine Cordell in relation to ongoing legal proceedings. Thank you for the indication that an application under section 35 of the Data Protection Act 1998 would be viewed favourably. We make this application under section 35 of the Data Protection Act 1998 to request details of all insurance claims submitted by Mr Rakesh Patel in relation to a burglary committed at Unit 3 Horrisons Industrial Estate. Mr Patel alleged in a section 9 statement to the Metropolitan Police that a burglary was committed between

01st May 2013

And

08th May 2013

He alleges that goods to the value of £8220 were stolen and damage to the walls estimated to be between £8,000 £10,000. Our client disputes involvement in the burglary but states that he did hire out his sound equipment in order for a private party to place arranged by persons legally squatting at the premises. Mr Cordell was forensically linked to the premises by DNA on a can of drink. Mr Cordell gave an explanation for this in that he stated that he oversaw the persons using his equipment. Mr Cordell has stated that when he arrived damage had already been caused and he has produced Facebook pictures purporting to be of the alleged premises. It is our understanding that you are in possession of photographs from previous burglaries at the same premises and the damage cited by Mr Patel in his statement to the police actually relates to damage already caused during a previous burglary and not

May 2013

as Mr Patel alleges. We rely on paragraph section 35 (2)

(a) and

(b) which states:

Personal data are exempt from the nondisclosure provisions where the disclosure is necessary

(a) for the purposes of, or in connection with, any legal proceedings (including prospective legal proceedings), or

74,

(b) for the purpose of obtaining legal advice, or is otherwise necessary for the purposes of establishing, exercising or defending legal rights. Mr Cordell faces a trial at Woolwich Crown Court in respect of an allegation of burglary. Mr Cordell contests this and alleges that he is being singled out and blamed for offences committed on earlier dates. He also denies causing the damage and alleges that this was caused on an earlier date. It is crucial to Mr Cordell's defence that any evidence that supports the fact that previous burglaries were committed, and extensive damage caused be disclosed in order that Mr Cordell can defend his legal rights. Any claims for stolen stock and any invoices submitted are also requested as old invoices have been submitted as part of these proceedings to support the value of the goods stolen. We would be grateful if the above could be disclosed as a matter of urgency. If you cannot disclose this information, then please confirm this in order that we can apply to the Court for a Third-Party Disclosure summons. We thank you in advance for your assistance in this matter.

Yours faithfully

MICHAEL CARROLL & CO

PS: We attach a copy of the statements made by Mr Patel in these proceedings and also a copy of the indictment which confirms the charge against Mr Cordell.

On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 11:44 AM, Allaway, Trevor <Trevor.Allaway@cluk.com> wrote:

Dear Sirs

We note your request for copies of our file.

Please make a section 35 DPA request and this will be viewed favourably.

Regards

Trevor Allaway

Cunningham Lindsey

1st Floor,3160 Park Square

Birmingham Business Park

Solihull, B37 7YN

Tel Office 0121 233 6765

Facsimile 0845 425 2850

email trevor.allaway@cluk.com

Confidentiality: This email and its attachments are solely for the use of the intended recipient(s). If they have come to you in error, you must take no action based on them nor must you copy or communicate them to anyone. Please notify us immediately and delete this communication.

Viruses: Although we have taken steps to ensure that this email and attachments are free from any virus, we advise that in keeping with good practice the recipient should ensure that they are actually virus free. Furthermore, we do not accept responsibility for any change made to this message after it was sent by the sender.

Security: Please be aware in communicating with us by email that internet email by its nature is not a 100% secure communications medium. This message is issued in furtherance to the business activities of Cunningham Lindsey and associated companies and every effort is made to control content. Should however inappropriate or non-business opinions be expressed Cunningham Lindsey will not accept any responsibility. Cunningham Lindsey United Kingdom is a company registered in England and Wales with company number 00159031. The company's registered office is Apex Plaza, Forbury Road,

Reading, Berkshire RG1 1AX. VAT No: 724 3766 27.

Si Note:

Disrepair!

I received unreliable promises of agreements of my landlords, causing me a breach of trust in relation to the problems that are to do with the damp not getting fixed in the needed efficient fair and timely manner as required by their company’s stationary duties, at my loss of life and cash expenses!

The disrepair issues remain unhurried from getting resolved in due process with concern for my health and safety after Enfield Council and Enfield homes as an add-on towards my dissatisfaction of their services!

Time Spent Building;

My mother also continues to work on building my company website for me with others at the Time Start: 09:00 and Time End: 14:00!

Working at Home doing Court Case Defence Work!

I spent time and resources costing expenditure with my mother also building my defence case, against the allegations getting put against me at the Time Start: 12:00 Am and Time End: 06:00 Am!

13/02/2014

Stuck on bail at my Own Home Address again for the Woolwich Crown Court Case!

Building the catalogue with Josh!

Issues with Housing Disrepair!

Working on My Website!

With Partner Two!

13/02/2014

Till the 17/02/2014

· Disrepair!

· 1st Curfew!

· The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue:

216. Lorraine Cordell_RE Simon Cordell Thank You for the help /

Page Numbers: 501

Gazebo Case!

The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue:

216. Lorraine Cordell_RE Simon Cordell Thank You for the help

/ Page Numbers: 501,

From: Lorraine Cordell [lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk]

Sent: 13 February 2014 14:24

To: 'jakinolugbade@nexuschambers.com'

Subject: Re: Simon Cordell Thank You for the help

Hi Jemi

Thank you for the section 8 you done for me and the understanding as to me getting very anxious about this case it has really got me more than anyone understands. I have sorted out with Josey the disagreement we had, and she is still representing me. I am hoping that you can still do my case, and I am looking forward to a meeting with you when Josey sets this up before the trial date. I am building up a list of things I would like to ask you, and I hope that we can get time to go over them all.

Many Thanks

Simon.

Si Note:

Disrepair!

It is unfair for me to get kept in this flat in the conditions that it is in I keep contacting local council and Enfield homes with no acknowledgement regarding my health and safety because of the disrepair conditions!

Time Spent Building;

My mother also continues to work on building my company website for me with others at the Time Start: 09:00 and Time End: 14:00!

Working at Home doing Court Case Defence Work!

I spent time and resources costing expenditure with my mother also building my defence case, against the allegations getting put against me at the Time Start: 12:00 Am and Time End: 06:00 Am!

14/02/2014

Stuck on bail at my Own Home Address again for the Woolwich Crown Court Case!

Building the catalogue with Josh!

Issues with Housing Disrepair!

Working on My Website!

14/02/2014 to the 17/02/2014

· Disrepair!

· 1st Curfew!

Disrepair!

The Enfield Council and Enfield home should always stay open-minded towards their statutory duties rather than displace their duties and cause neglect in my life!

Time Spent Building;

My mother also continues to work on building my company website for me with others at the Time Start: 09:00 and Time End: 14:00!

Working at Home doing Court Case Defence Work!

I spent time and resources costing expenditure with my mother also building my defence case, against the allegations getting put against me at the Time Start: 12:00 Am and Time End: 06:00 Am!

15/02/2014

Stuck on bail at my Own Home Address again for the Woolwich Crown Court Case!

Building the catalogue with Josh!

Issues with Housing Disrepair!

Working on My Website!

15/02/2014 to the 17/02/2014

· Disrepair!

· 1st Curfew!

Disrepair!

I made the relevant phone calls today to the Enfield homes and Enfield Council complaints department so to receive an efficient service regarding my damp heating ventilation and the sound issues of disrepair that I face on a daily basis within my rented home but ended up receiving a service from the staff that caused me intentional infliction of emotional distress from their reckless disregard of lack of concern in addressing the damp issues another disrepair problem within my flat!

Time Spent Building;

My mother also continues to work on building my company website for me with others at the Time Start: 09:00 and Time End: 14:00!

Working at Home doing Court Case Defence Work!

I spent time and resources costing expenditure with my mother also building my defence case, against the allegations getting put against me at the Time Start: 12:00 Am and Time End: 06:00 Am!

16/02/2014

Stuck on bail at my Own Home Address again for the Woolwich Crown Court Case!

Building the catalogue with Josh!

Issues with Housing Disrepair!

Working on My Website!

With Partner Two!

16/02/2014 to the 17/02/2014

· Disrepair!

· 1st Curfew!

Disrepair!

Today my friends visited my home and see me shivering cold without no heating I found this unamusing because it's of no fault of my own and I feel as if when I should get supported by the Enfield Council and then four times within their statutory duties in rectifying the disrepair issues within my home such as the non-existing heating!

Time Spent Building;

My mother also continues to work on building my company website for me with others at the Time Start: 09:00 and Time End: 14:00!

Working at Home doing Court Case Defence Work!

I spent time and resources costing expenditure with my mother also building my defence case, against the allegations getting put against me at the Time Start: 12:00 Am and Time End: 06:00 Am!

17/02/2014

Stuck on bail at my Own Home Address again for the Woolwich Crown Court Case!

Building the catalogue with Josh!

Issues with Housing Disrepair!

Working on My Website!

With Partner Two!

17/02/2014

· Disrepair!

· 1st Curfew

· Paying for My;

PNC record “Missing”

Criminal PNC

Gazebo Case!

· The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue:

217. Westminster /

Page Numbers: 502,503

Criminal PNC

Gazebo Case!

· The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue:

219. Lorraine Cordell _Re_ Outcome for fail to surrender /

Page Numbers: 504

Criminal PNC

Gazebo Case!

· The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue:

165. JOSEPHINE WARD _Re_ Outcome for fail to surrender /

Page Numbers: 505,506

Criminal PNC

Gazebo Case!

· The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue:

220. JOSEPHINE Ward _Regina v_ (19) /

Page Numbers: 507

Gazebo Case!

Paying for My;

PNC record “Missing”

The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue:

217. Westminster

/ Page Numbers: 502,503,

From: westminster.gov.uk

[westminster.gov@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk]

Sent: 17 February 2014 14:24

To: 'lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk'

Subject: RE: Simon Cordell error on record.

Attachments: DOC002.PDF

Good afternoon Ms Cordell

I attach the memorandum of conviction from the case of Simon Cordell heard on 03.03.2008.

Regards

Wendy Morgan

Applications Department

Westminster Magistrates' Court

From: westminster.mc

Sent: 12 February 2014 13:03

To: westminster.gov.uk

Subject: FW: Simon Cordell error on record.

From: Lorraine Cordell [Mail To:lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk]

Sent: 12 February 2014 12:45

To: westminster.mc

Subject: Re: Simon Cordell error on record.

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing this email after a call that was made to the City of London Magistrate Court on the

10/02/2014

I was told on the

10/02/2014

03/03/2008

at the City of London Magistrate Court, for failing to surrender to custody at appointed time, on the

25/01/2008.

The error is that I did not go to go but my mum called the court and a sick note was handed to the court and the case was dismissed, so should not be on my record, this has caused me problems with bail on a few times and this is why calls have been made before to the court, at this time it has been causing me problems again with a case I am at Woolwich Crown court for. I have attached the page for the PNC print out the police did for the case at Woolwich crown court that I am on bail now for. This print out was done by the police on or around the

26 June 2013

10/02/2014

when I called that if I ask for a court transcript that this could be done faster than updating the PNC records and I would be able to show the Judge at Woolwich crown court

503,

the court transcript for the case that is on my file in error and that should be enough to prove that it should not be on my record. I am there for asking for the court transcript to be sent to me if there are costs for this please email me back with the cost for this to be sent to me and I will get this paid to the court. Please see attached file for the page in my PNC record which is there in error I have highlighted the case. If this can be done as a matter of urgency due to the impact this is having on my life.

Many Thanks

Mr Simon Cordell

DOB 26/01/1981

This email was received from the INTERNET and scanned by the Government Secure Intranet antivirus service supplied by Vodafone in partnership with Symantec. (CCTM Certificate Number 2009/09/0052.) In case of problems, please call your organisation's IT Helpdesk. Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal purposes. This email (and any attachment) is intended only for the attention of the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy all copies and inform the sender by return email. Internet email is not a secure medium. Any reply to this message could be intercepted and read by someone else. Please bear that in mind when deciding whether to send material in response to this message by email. This email (whether you are the sender or the recipient) may be monitored, recorded and retained by the Ministry of Justice. Email monitoring / blocking software may be used, and email content may be read at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are not broken when composing or forwarding emails and their contents. The original of this email was scanned for viruses by the Government Secure Intranet virus scanning service supplied by Vodafone in partnership with Symantec. (CCTM Certificate Number 2009/09/0052.) On leaving the GSi this email was certified virus free. Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal purposes.

The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue:

219. Lorraine Cordell _Re_ Outcome for fail to surrender

/ Page Numbers: 504,

From: Lorraine Cordell [lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk]

Sent: 17 February 2014 15:13

To: 'JOSEPHINE WARD'

Subject: RE: Outcome for fail to surrender

Attachments: My Email to Court.pdf;

City of London Court Receipt.pdf;

City of London Court outcome fail to surrender.pdf

Hi Josey

I just been emailed from the court the outcome of the city of London case fail to surrender as you will see from attached copy that has been sent over to me today from the court this case was dismissed. I had to pay £5.00 to get this from the court so I will email you the copy of the receipt also and the email I sent to court to get this dealt with I will send this over so you have copies of it. So, on Simon bail for this case there should be no fail to surrender, as he has never failed to surrender to the police or the court. Also, there are some other things on the PNC that I want to look into as there are some other errors, I am sure, but I wanted to get this one dealt with 1st as this was causing a problem. Also, Simon has looked over the section 8 and there are some errors with the dates Jemi put March and not May in 2 places also he put in section 2, 21. arrested win connections I think that should have been with and not win. Not sure if you corrected this with the one you sent over to the court.

Also is it 9.30am Simon needs to be at court tomorrow can you let me know please.

Many Thanks

Lorraine

The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue:

165. JOSEPHINE WARD _Re_ Outcome for fail to surrender

/ Page Numbers: 505,506,

From: JOSEPHINE WARD [josephinewardsolicitor@gmail.com]

Sent: 17 February 2014 17:53

To: Lorraine Cordell

Subject: Re: Outcome for fail to surrender

Hi Lorraine

Thank you for the information. I have forwarded this to the barrister, Andy Locke who is covering the hearing tomorrow. I asked for the case to be removed from the list for two weeks as I have yet to hear back from the Insurance company and the prosecution, but the court went ahead and listed it. Simon must attend by 11am. His case is fourth on so if he arrives at court for 10.30am he will be in plenty of time. I will send a chaser email to the Trevor Allaway this evening. He is in court 7. If the insurance file and the disclosure from the police comes back favourably then coupled with the confirmation that Simon has no convictions for failing to surrender I will try again to get his bail conditions relaxed but I stress I can only do this once I am in receipt of the disclosure and this will be dependent on what the disclosure reveals. I can then compile all the case papers for the defence and assess whether we can make a request for the prosecution to review the prosecution against Simon. I think that they will proceed regardless but I will try once I am in receipt of all the information and if this information assists the defence and undermines the prosecution. I will arrange an appointment with Simon for this weekend / early next week and I hope to have some disclosure before the. Any questions please do not hesitate to come back to me.

Regards

Josephine

On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 3:12 PM, Lorraine Cordell <lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:

Hi Josey

I just been emailed from the court the outcome of the city of London case fail to surrender as you will see from the attached copy that has been sent over to me today from the court this case was dismissed. I had to pay £5.00 to get this from the court so I will email you the copy of the receipt also and the email I sent to the court to get this dealt with I will send this over so you have copies of it. So, on Simon bail for this case there should be no fail to surrender, as he has never failed to surrender to the police or the court. Also, there are some other things on the PNC that I want to look into as there are some other errors, I am sure, but I wanted to get this one dealt with 1st as this was causing a problem.

506,

Also, Simon has looked over the section 8 and there are some errors with the dates Jemi put March and not May in 2 places also he put in section 2, 21. arrested win connections I think that should have been with and not win. Not sure if you corrected this with the one you sent over to the court. Also is it 9.30am Simon needs to be at court tomorrow can you let me know please.

Many Thanks

Lorraine

The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue:

220. JOSEPHINE Ward _Regina v_ (19)

/ Page Numbers: 507,

From: JOSEPHINE WARD [josephinewardsolicitor@gmail.com]

Sent: 17 February 2014 17:57

To: Allaway, Trevor; Lorraine Cordell; too smooth; Andrew Locke

Subject: Regina v. Simon Cordell for mention at Woolwich Crown Court on

18th February 2014

Dear Mr Allaway

Further to my email of

12th February 2014

can you please confirm whether a decision has yet been made as to the release of the Patel file?

I await hearing from you and any update in advance of tomorrow's hearing would be appreciated.

Yours faithfully

MICHAEL CARROLL & CO SOLICITORS

Si Note:

Disrepair!

I continue to highlight my issues of concern causing me dissatisfaction with the disrepair issues within my flats but no reasonable person from Enfield Council or Enfield homes complies with their statutory duties and the time that these problems have got left to eclipse is unprofessional behaviour!

Time Spent Building;

My mother also continues to work on building my company website for me with others at the Time Start: 09:00 and Time End: 14:00!

Working at Home doing Court Case Defence Work!

I spent time and resources costing expenditure with my mother also building my defence case, against the allegations getting put against me at the Time Start: 12:00 Am and Time End: 06:00 Am!

18/02/2014

Stuck on bail at my Own Home Address again for the Woolwich Crown Court Case!

Building the catalogue with Josh!

Issues with Housing Disrepair!

Working on My Website!

18/02/2014

· Disrepair!

· 1st Curfew!

· The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue:

285. JOSEPHINE Ward _Fwd._ Regina v_ (2) /

Page Numbers: 508,509

Gazebo Case!

My Company Too Smooth!

The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue:

285. JOSEPHINE Ward _Fwd._ Regina v_ (2)

/ Page Numbers: 508,509,

From: JOSEPHINE WARD [josephinewardsolicitor@gmail.com]

Sent: 18 February 2014 11:41

To: Andrew Locke; Lorraine Cordell; too smooth; Del Edgeler; J.B. AkinOlugbade

Subject: Fwd.: Regina v. Simon Cordell for mention at Woolwich Crown Court on

18th February 2014

Dear All

Please see response that I received from the insurance company.

Regards

Josephine

Forwarded message from:

Allaway, Trevor <Trevor.Allaway@cluk.com>

Date: Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 10:09 AM

Subject: RE: Regina v. Simon Cordell for mention at Woolwich Crown Court on

18th February 2014

To: JOSEPHINE WARD <josephinewardsolicitor@gmail.com>

Dear Sirs

We will pass the relevant copies to you as soon as possible but please bear in mind that as loss adjusters we are already working under considerable pressure.

Regards

Trevor Allaway

Cunningham Lindsey

1st Floor,3160 Park Square

Birmingham Business Park

Solihull, B37 7YN

Tel Office 0121 233 6765

Facsimile 0845 425 2850

email Trevor.Allaway@cluk.com

From: JOSEPHINE WARD [Mail To:josephinewardsolicitor@gmail.com]

Sent: 17 February 2014 17:57

To: Allaway, Trevor; Lorraine Cordell; too smooth; Andrew Locke

509,

Subject: Regina v. Simon Cordell for mention at Woolwich Crown Court on

18th February 2014

Dear Mr Allaway

Further to my email of

12th February 2014

can you please confirm whether a decision has yet been made as to the release of the Patel file?

I await hearing from you and any update in advance of tomorrow's hearing would be appreciated.

Yours faithfully

MICHAEL CARROLL & CO SOLICITORS

Si Note:

Disrepair!

The Damp in my home is causing me breathing issues and the cold weather makes me wake up in cold and hot sweats of the night time this is causing my health to deteriorate all I can do is pray that the problems get resolved soon!

Time Spent Building;

In the background of everything going on I finished working on Creating a new and up to date Index of the Too Smooth Entertainment Health & Safety Policy Licensee’s and amending the Statement and Contents and I continued to Study and finish at the Time Start: 07:00 Am and Time End: 03:30 Pm!

My mother also continues to work on building my company website for me with others at the Time Start: 09:00 and Time End: 14:00!

Time Spent Building;

I spent time and resources costing expenditure with my mother also building my defence case, against the allegations getting put against me at the Time Start: 12:00 Am and Time End: 06:00 Am!

19/02/2014

Stuck on bail at my Own Home Address again for the Woolwich Crown Court Case!

Building the catalogue with Josh!

Issues with Housing Disrepair!

Working on My Website!

With Partner Two!

19/02/2014

· Disrepair!

· 1st Curfew!

· Email got sent about

PNC “Missing”

Criminal PNC

Email got sent about

PNC “Missing”

From: Lorraine Cordell [Mail To:lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk]

Sent: 19 February 2014 13:36

To: GL-HCORNERMCENQ

Subject: Re: Simon Cordell Errors on Cases.

Mr. Simon Paul Cordell

109 Burncroft Road

Enfield

Middlesex

EN3 7JQ

18/02/2014

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing this email as I have an ongoing case at Woolwich Crown Court, and I have noticed some errors in my PNC record which the police printed of at around

25/06/2013

I do know there are some errors on the cases that was heard at Enfield Magistrates and can see

516,

them clearly, but due to how far they go back cannot remember some of the cases. I do also know some are correct but due to some dates being wrong on some of the ones I can see errors in I would like to check all the cases on the PNC that was heard at Enfield Magistrates. If this can be done as a matter of urgency due to the impact this is having on my life with the case that is ongoing at Woolwich Crown Court and my bail and other issues. If the information could be emailed to me, I would be grateful as I am next in court on March 2014 and would like this information of any errors so I can show the judge. Please see below the lists of cases I would like information on.

517,

“Forwarded image!”

518,

“Forwarded image!”

519,

“Forwarded image!”

520,

Yours faithfully

Mr Simon Paul Cordell DOB 26/01/1981

This email was received from the INTERNET and scanned by the Government Secure Intranet antivirus service supplied by Vodafone in partnership with Symantec. (CCTM Certificate Number 2009/09/0052.) In case of problems, please call your organisation's IT Helpdesk. Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal purposes. This e-mail (and any attachment) is intended only for the attention of the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage, or copying is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy all copies and inform the sender by return e-mail. Internet e-mail is not a secure medium. Any reply to this message could be intercepted and read by someone else. Please bear that in mind when deciding whether to send material in response to this message by e-mail. This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the recipient) may be monitored, recorded, and retained by the Ministry of Justice. E-mail monitoring / blocking software may be used, and e-mail content may be read at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are not broken when composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents.

521,

N/a

Si Note:

Disrepair!

I feel uncomfortable within my home and lack the enjoyment off stability due to the disrepair issues in breach within my tenancy agreement on behalf of the Enfield Council and Enfield homes that refused to upkeep to their signed agreement with me!

Time Spent Building;

In the background of everything going on I started working on Creating a new up to date Organization and Arrangements Statements and policy and I continued to Study and finish at the Time Start: 07:00 Am and Time End: 03:30 Pm!

My mother also continues to work on building my company website for me with others at the Time Start: 09:00 and Time End: 14:00!

Working at Home doing Court Case Defence Work!

I spent time and resources costing expenditure with my mother also building my defence case, against the allegations getting put against me at the Time Start: 12:00 Am and Time End: 06:00 Am!

20/02/2014

Stuck on bail at my Own Home Address again for the Woolwich Crown Court Case!

Building the catalogue with Josh!

Issues with Housing Disrepair!

Working on My Website!

20/02/2014

· Disrepair!

· 1st Curfew!

· The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue:

223. GL-HCORNERMCENQ_RE_ Simon Cordell Errors on Cases /

Page Numbers: 515,516,517,518,519,520,521

Criminal PNC

· The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue:

224. Lorraine Cordell _Re_ Simon Cordell Errors on Cases_ (9) /

Page Numbers: 522,523,524,525,526,527,528

Criminal PNC

The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue:

223. GL-HCORNERMCENQ_RE_ Simon Cordell Errors on Cases

/ Page Numbers: 515,516,517,518,519,520,521,

From: GL-HCORNERMCENQ gl-hcomermcenq@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk

Sent: 20 February 2014 12:14

To: 'Lorraine Cordell'

Subject: RE: Simon Cordell Errors on Cases.

Dear Mr Cordell,

Further to the conversation between Mrs Cordell and a member of staff yesterday, please specify which dates and offences you wish us to check. Almost all the offences are archived and not immediately accessible using the computer; specific dates and offences would help reduce the delay in providing this information.

Regards,

Customer Services Unit Administration Office Highbury Corner Magistrates Court

Tel: 0207-506 3100

Fax: 0870 739 5768

e-mail: GL-HCORNERMCENQ@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk

I am neither authorised to bind the Ministry of Justice contractually, nor to make representations or other statements which may bind the Ministry of Justice in any way via electronic means.

From: Lorraine Cordell [Mail To:lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk]

Sent: 19 February 2014 13:36

To: GL-HCORNERMCENQ

Subject: Re: Simon Cordell Errors on Cases.

Mr. Simon Paul Cordell

109 Burncroft Road

Enfield

Middlesex

EN3 7JQ

18/02/2014

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing this email as I have an ongoing case at Woolwich Crown Court, and I have noticed some errors in my PNC record which the police printed of at around

25/06/2013

I do know there are some errors on the cases that was heard at Enfield Magistrates and can see

516,

517,

“Forwarded image!”

518,

“Forwarded image!”

519,

“Forwarded image!”

520,

Yours faithfully

Mr Simon Paul Cordell DOB 26/01/1981

This email was received from the INTERNET and scanned by the Government Secure Intranet antivirus service supplied by Vodafone in partnership with Symantec. (CCTM Certificate Number 2009/09/0052.) In case of problems, please call your organisation's IT Helpdesk. Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal purposes. This e-mail (and any attachment) is intended only for the attention of the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage, or copying is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy all copies and inform the sender by return e-mail. Internet e-mail is not a secure medium. Any reply to this message could be intercepted and read by someone else. Please bear that in mind when deciding whether to send material in response to this message by e-mail. This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the recipient) may be monitored, recorded, and retained by the Ministry of Justice. E-mail monitoring / blocking software may be used, and e-mail content may be read at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are not broken when composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents.

521,

N/a

The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue:

224. Lorraine Cordell _Re_ Simon Cordell Errors on Cases_ (9)

/ Page Numbers: 522,523,524,525,526,527,528,

From: Lorraine Cordell [lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk]

Sent: 20 February 2014 12:29

To: 'GLHCORNERMCENQ'

Subject: RE: Simon Cordell Errors on Cases.

Hello

I do understand that most of the items listed in my emails are archived due to their date but as I can see errors in the dates of some of the things and I know this as fact I would like all items checked that is listed so that it can be checked against the PNC records I have got the print out from.

Many Thanks

Simon Cordell

From: GLHCORNERMCENQ

[Mail To: glhcornermcenq@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk]

Sent: 20 February 2014 12:14

To: 'Lorraine Cordell'

Subject: RE: Simon Cordell Errors on Cases.

Dear Mr Cordell,

Further to the conversation between Mrs Cordell and a member of staff yesterday, please specify which dates and offences you wish us to check. Almost all the offences are archived and not immediately accessible using the computer; specific dates and offences would help reduce the delay in providing this information.

Regards,

Customer Services Unit

Administration Office

Highbury Corner Magistrates Court

Tel: 0207506

3100

Fax: 0870 739 5768

email: GLHCORNERMCENQ@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk

I am neither authorised to bind the Ministry of Justice contractually, nor to make representations or other statements which may bind the Ministry of Justice in any way via electronic means.

523,

“Same as Above!”

524,

“Same as Above!”

525,

“Same as Above!”

526,

“Same as Above!”

527,

“Same as Above!”

528,

“Same as Above!”

Si Note:

Disrepair!

My kitchen is becoming unhygienic due to the moisture that the Dam please I continue to wrap it off and try my best to upkeep the premises to a fair level of degree I will contact the council again in the morning regarding the issues of disrepair!

The council officers told me not to enter my bedroom because of the hazardous damp and mushrooms growing on the walls and on my bed linen and on the mattress, I don't know what I will do next how am I going to replace all of this property of mine this is unfair and not my fault!

Time Spent Building;

In the background of everything going on I continued working on Creating a new up to date Organization and Arrangements Statements and policy and I continued to Study and finish at the Time Start: 07:00 Am and Time End: 03:30 Pm!

My mother also continues to work on building my company website for me with others at the Time Start: 09:00 and Time End: 14:00!

Working at Home doing Court Case Defence Work!

I spent time and resources costing expenditure with my mother also building my defence case, against the allegations getting put against me at the Time Start: 12:00 Am and Time End: 06:00 Am!

21/02/2014

Stuck on bail at my Own Home Address again for the Woolwich Crown Court Case!

Building the catalogue with Josh!

Issues with Housing Disrepair!

Working on My Website!

21/02/2014

· Disrepair!

· 1st Curfew!

· The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue:

225. GL-HCORNERMCENQ_RE_ Simon Cordell Errors on Cases_ (1) /

Page Numbers: 529,530,531,532,533,534,535,536

Criminal PNC

· The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue:

226. JOSEPHINE Ward _Regina v_ (20) /

Page Numbers: 537

Gazebo Case!

The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue:

225. GL-HCORNERMCENQ_RE_ Simon Cordell Errors on Cases_ (1)

/ Page Numbers: 529,530,531,532,533,534,535,536,

From: GLHCORNERMCENQ

[glhcornermcenq@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk]

Sent: 21 February 2014 16:06

To: 'Lorraine Cordell'

Subject: RE: Simon Cordell Errors on Cases.

Dear Mr Cordell,

The records you request are at another court. We will begin searching for them next week when the court is open.

Regards,

Customer Services Unit

Administration Officer

Highbury Corner Magistrates Court

Tel: 0207506

3100

Fax: 0870 739 5768

email: GLHCORNERMCENQ@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk

I am neither authorised to bind the Ministry of Justice contractually, nor to make representations or other statements which may bind the Ministry of Justice in any way via electronic means.

From: Lorraine Cordell [Mail To:lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk]

Sent: 20 February 2014 12:29

To: GLHCORNERMCENQ

Subject: RE: Simon Cordell Errors on Cases.

Hello

Many Thanks

Simon Cordell

From: GLHCORNERMCENQ

[Mail To: glhcornermcenq@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk]

Sent: 20 February 2014 12:14

To: 'Lorraine Cordell'

Subject: RE: Simon Cordell Errors on Cases.

Dear Mr Cordell,

Further to the conversation between Mrs. Cordell and a member of staff yesterday, please specify

530,

which dates and offences you wish us to check. Almost all the offences are archived and not immediately accessible using the computer; specific dates and offences would help reduce the delay in providing this information.

Regards,

Customer Services Unit

Administration Office

Highbury Corner Magistrates Court

Tel: 0207506 3100

Fax: 0870 739 5768

email: GLHCORNERMCENQ@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk

I am neither authorised to bind the Ministry of Justice contractually, nor to make representations or other statements which may bind the Ministry of Justice in any way via electronic means.

From: Lorraine Cordell [Mail To:lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk]

Sent: 19 February 2014 13:36

To: GLHCORNERMCENQ

Subject: Re: Simon Cordell Errors on Cases.

Mr. Simon Paul Cordell

109 Burncroft Road

Enfield

Middlesex

EN3 7JQ

18/02/2014

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing this email as I have an ongoing case at Woolwich Crown Court, and I have noticed some errors in my PNC record which the police printed of at around

25/06/2013

I would be very grateful if you can pull up the following records so I can check them with the PNC the police printed off for the case that is ongoing at Woolwich Crown Court, I have been told I will need a Memorandum of conviction or the transcript for the case. I do know there are some errors on the cases that was heard at Enfield Magistrates and can see them clearly, but due to how far they go back cannot remember some of the cases. I do also know some are correct but due to some dates being wrong on some of the ones I can see errors in I would like to check all the cases on the PNC that was heard at Enfield Magistrates. If this can be done as a matter of urgency due to the impact this is having on my life with the case that is ongoing at Woolwich Crown Court and my bail and other issues.

531,

If the information could be emailed to me, I would be grateful as I am next in court on March 2014 and would like this information of any errors so I can show the judge. Please see below the lists of cases I would like information on.

532,533,534,

535,

Yours faithfully

Mr Simon Paul Cordell DOB 26/01/1981

This email was received from the INTERNET and scanned by the Government Secure Intranet antivirus service supplied by Vodafone in partnership with Symantec. (CCTM Certificate Number 2009/09/0052.) In case of problems, please call your organisation's IT Helpdesk. Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal purposes. This e-mail (and any attachment) is intended only for the attention of the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy all copies and inform the sender by return e-mail. Internet e-mail is not a secure medium. Any reply to this message could be intercepted and read by someone else. Please bear that in mind when deciding whether to send material in response to this message by e-mail. This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the recipient) may be monitored, recorded and retained by the Ministry of Justice. E-mail monitoring / blocking software may be used, and e-mail content may be read at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are not broken when composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents.

The original of this email was scanned for viruses by the Government Secure Intranet virus scanning service supplied by Vodafone in partnership with Symantec. (CCTM Certificate Number 2009/09/0052.) On leaving the GSi this email was certified virus free. Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal purposes. This email was received from the INTERNET and scanned by the Government Secure Intranet antivirus service supplied by Vodafone in partnership with Symantec. (CCTM Certificate Number 2009/09/0052.) In case of problems, please call your organisation's IT Helpdesk. Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal purposes. This e-mail (and any attachment) is intended only for the attention of the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy all copies and inform the sender by return e-mail.

536,

N/a

The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue:

226. JOSEPHINE Ward _Regina v_ (20)

/ Page Numbers: 537,

From: JOSEPHINE WARD [josephinewardsolicitor@gmail.com]

Sent: 21 February 2014 13:14

To: too smooth; Lorraine Cordell; J.B. AkinOlugbade

Subject: Regina v. Simon Cordell for mention on 4th March 2014 at Woolwich Crown Court

Attachments: INSURANCE FILE.pdf

Dear Simon / Lorraine / Jemi

I refer to the above matter.

Please see attached a copy of the insurance file. I will require the police disclosure before tackling the issue of bail again and I hope to be in possession of this before the

04th March 2014

I will email a copy of the insurance file to the CPS also to further bolster the argument about disclosure of all police files in relation to the earlier two break in / burglaries. You will all not doubt note the insurance quotes and the names of the company providing the quotes, the amounts quoted and the damage being caused before

May 2013

I do not see any evidence of any money paid out to repair the wall and I will ask the insurance company if Mr Patel has provided any that this was done or the cost. It is referred to in email but no quote is attached or indeed the date the work was undertaken. The photographs provided by the insurance company do not assist as they do not show the damage to the internal walls but the police files for the first two offences may well confirm that the damage is identical. This and the links from Facebook. As you are aware of, I do not receive the police disclosure by the

04th March 2014

then I will have to make a further application for the case to be listed for lack of disclosure.

Should you have any questions re the documents forwarded then please do not hesitate to contact me.

Regards

Josephine

Si Note:

Disrepair!

My plasma TV blew up this morning I know it's because of the damp dark been telling Enfield Council and Enfield homes about with no action being taken by themselves I continue to take pictures of the damage towards my apps and my emotional distress!

Time Spent Building;

My mother also continues to work on building my company website for me with others at the Time Start: 09:00 and Time End: 14:00!

Working at Home doing Court Case Defence Work!

I spent time and resources costing expenditure with my mother also building my defence case, against the allegations getting put against me at the Time Start: 12:00 Am and Time End: 06:00 Am!

22/02/2014

Stuck on bail at my Own Home Address again for the Woolwich Crown Court Case!

Building the catalogue with Josh!

Issues with Housing Disrepair!

Working on My Website!

With Partner Two!

22/02/2014

· Disrepair!

· 1st Curfew!

Disrepair!

The Enfield Council and the Enfield homes have not fulfilled their agreement within the tenancy and at carefree towards my well-being their reckless behaviour towards myself is insufficient towards their statutory duties of care towards their tenants me!

Time Spent Building;

My mother also continues to work on building my company website for me with others at the Time Start: 09:00 and Time End: 14:00!

Working at Home doing Court Case Defence Work!

I spent time and resources costing expenditure with my mother also building my defence case, against the allegations getting put against me at the Time Start: 12:00 Am and Time End: 06:00 Am!

23/02/2014

Stuck on bail at my Own Home Address again for the Woolwich Crown Court Case!

Building the catalogue with Josh!

Issues with Housing Disrepair!

Working on My Website!

With Partner Two!

23/02/2014

· Disrepair!

· 1st Curfew!

Disrepair!

Living in such dreadful conditions on humane the flat would be nice if it was correct and kept up to the spare ISO standards but this simple upkeep gets this minute by the Enfield Council and the Enfield homes relevant departments of concern in reference towards the damp heating air ventilation and sound issues of disrepair!

Time Spent Building;

My mother also continues to work on building my company website for me with others at the Time Start: 09:00 and Time End: 14:00!

Working at Home doing Court Case Defence Work!

I spent time and resources costing expenditure with my mother also building my defence case, against the allegations getting put against me at the Time Start: 12:00 Am and Time End: 06:00 Am!

24/02/2014

Stuck on bail at my Own Home Address again for the Woolwich Crown Court Case!

Building the catalogue with Josh!

Issues with Housing Disrepair!

Working on My Website!

24/02/2014

· Disrepair!

· 1st Curfew!

· The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue:

227. Lorraine Cordell _Re_ Simon Cordell CX52JRZ /

Page Numbers: 538

Brixton Case / Met Police!

Broadsure Insurance!

· The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue:

228. Lorraine Cordell _Re_ Simon Cordell REG CX52JRX /

Page Numbers: 539

Brixton Case / Met Police!

Broadsure Insurance!

· Additional Email Attachments & Emails / Issue:

1. 8

lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk_02.24.2014_RE RE Simon Cordell CX52JRZ

24/02/2014

/ Page Numbers: 44,45

· Additional Email Attachments & Emails / Issue:

1. 9

lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk_02.24.2014_RE Simon Cordell REG CX52JRX

24/02/2014

/ Page Numbers: 46,47

The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue:

227. Lorraine Cordell _Re_ Simon Cordell CX52JRZ

/ Page Numbers: 538,

From: Lorraine Cordell [lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk]

Sent: 24 February 2014 16:34

To: 'martinjenkin@broadsuredirect.com'

Subject: RE: RE: Simon Cordell CX52JRZ

Attachments: soldVanCX52JRZ.jpg

Hi Martin

After the call today please see the attached recipe for the Van CX52JRZ

Lorraine

The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue:

228. Lorraine Cordell _Re_ Simon Cordell REG CX52JRX

/ Page Numbers: 539,

From: Lorraine Cordell [lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk]

Sent: 24 February 2014 19:09

To: 'martinjenkin@broadsuredirect.com'

Subject: RE: Simon Cordell REG CX52JRX

Attachments: SoldVanCX52JRZ27042013.jpg;

BuyVanrecieptCX52JRZ10112013.jpg

Hi Martin

Today when I sent over the recipe for the van, I sent over the wrong one. Simon has just come here and showed me the last 2 recipes for the van. I believe you already have the

10/11/2013

as I emailed this over to you on the

15/11/2013

at 15.57 Lorraine

Additional Email Attachments & Emails / Issue:

1. 8

lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk_02.24.2014_RE RE Simon Cordell CX52JRZ

24/02/2014

/ Page Numbers: 44,45

44,

From: Lorraine Cordell lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk

Sent: 24 February 2014 16:34

To: martinjenkin@broadsuredirect.com

Subject: RE: RE: Simon Cordell CX52JRZ

Attachments: sold-Van-CX52JRZ.jpg

Hi Martin

After the call today please see the attached recipe for the Van CX52JRZ Lorraine

45,

Additional Email Attachments & Emails / Issue:

1. 9

lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk_02.24.2014_RE Simon Cordell REG CX52JRX

24/02/2014

/ Page Numbers: 46,47

46,

From: Lorraine Cordell lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk

Sent: 24 February 2014 19:09

To: martinjenkin@broadsuredirect.com

Subject: RE: Simon Cordell REG CX52JRX

Attachments: Sold-Van-CX52JRZ-27-04-2013.jpg

Buy-Van-reciept-CX52JRZ-10-11-2013.jpg

Hi Martin

Today when I sent over the recipe for the van, I sent over the wrong one. Simon has just come here and showed me the last 2 recipes for the van. I believe you already have the 10/11/2013 as I emailed this over to you on the 15/11/2013 at 15.57

Lorraine

47,

Si Note:

Disrepair!

When I first moved into this property and never understood the problems of disrepair, I was contempt and therefore happy while I enjoy the enjoyment out of the rented premises but since I noticed the issues, I raise of concern to the Enfield Council in Enfield homes correct departments and received no correct follow-ups I feel further if satisfied and disheartened in believing that the problems will ever get a dress in their responses time!

Time Spent Building;

My mother also continues to work on building my company website for me with others at the Time Start: 09:00 and Time End: 14:00!

Working at Home doing Court Case Defence Work!

I spent time and resources costing expenditure with my mother also building my defence case, against the allegations getting put against me at the Time Start: 12:00 Am and Time End: 06:00 Am!

25/02/2014

Stuck on bail at my Own Home Address again for the Woolwich Crown Court Case!

Building the catalogue with Josh!

Issues with Housing Disrepair!

Working on My Website!

25/02/2014

· Disrepair!

· 1st Curfew!

· The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue:

229. Lorraine Cordell _Re_ Simon Cordell Logbook_ (1) /

Page Numbers: 540

Brixton Case / Met Police!

Broadsure Insurance!

· The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue:

230. Lorraine Cordell _Re_ Simon Cordell_ (24) /

Page Numbers: 541

Brixton Case / Met Police!

Broadsure Insurance!

· The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue:

231. Lorraine Cordell _Re_ Simon Cordell Doctors /

Page Numbers: 542

Gazebo Case!

Doctors!

The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue:

229. Lorraine Cordell _Re_ Simon Cordell Logbook_ (1)

/ Page Numbers: 540,

From: Lorraine Cordell [lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk]

Sent: 25 March 2014 11:40

To: 'Martin Jenkin'

Subject: RE: Simon Cordell Logbook

Attachments: CX52JRZlogbookfull.pdf

Dear Martin

Here is the logbook for CX52JRZ please see attached. I did call DVLA after I got the letter from them which showed the spelling of the last name wrong as it was spelled Cardell and not Cordell, they told me I had to wait until the logbook come in the post and then to fill in section 6 to get it corrected. Which I will be doing. Also, I have also noticed today when the logbook came in the post and I am not sure why they have put the new keepers date as

15/02/2014

as the green slip section 10 was sent to them, so the date of the

10/11/2013

was on it so I will be writing a letter to ask why this was done, along with the section 6 to correct the last name. Could you please update us as to when this can be sorted with KGM as to the claim that is against Simon so he can sort his insurance out. Also, about the claim for

09 Dec 2013

we still have not heard from KGM as to when someone will be sent out to take a report from Simon could this be looked into?

And also, I know there was some confusion as to the number that was called to report this on the

09 Dec 2013

please see the below information from my phone bill Mon 09 Dec 13:28 SPEC SERV 08444126412 22:00 The call was made to 08444126412 at 13:28 and lasted 22 min this is when Simon called to report what had happened on the

09/12/2013

and give all the information which the person noted. I know there is some issue as to the lady who witnessed this information being missing but it was all given on this call. If it can be possible can someone get the tape for this call and get the information to the witness so KGM can contact her about what she saw and who was at fault.

Lorraine

The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue:

230. Lorraine Cordell _Re_ Simon Cordell_ (24)

/ Page Numbers: 541,

From: Lorraine Cordell [lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk]

Sent: 25 February 2014 14:31

To: 'martinjenkin@broadsuredirect.com

Subject: RE: Simon Cordell Hi Martin

Can you please give an update as to what is going on please with my insurance?

I do not think it is right that KGM are doing this with my no claims, KGM has made one phone call to me about a claim on the

14/09/2013

where I told them, I would send the invoice for the van, since this time I have not had one single letter to say they did not get the invoice, or any letters about this so-called claim for the

14/09/2013

and this is nearly 6 months old now. How can it be I have not had one single letter yet now my insurance is due to be renewed they bring up this and this is nearly 6 months down the line and I have heard nothing about this claim since I talked to someone from KGM on the phone back in

Sep 2013?

I have still not had any letters about the subject access request under the data protect act 1998, and the letter I emailed yourself to send over to KGM on the

26/11/2013

at 15.46 and will now be taking this up with the ICO. I have never had so many problems with an insurance company in my life then what I have had in the past year with KGM, and will be taking this up with the insurance ombudsman I have already spoken to them and they are very shocked at what I have told them and that is not all of it, they have asked me to write it all down and send it to them by email which I will be doing. There should be only one thing that is outstanding and that is the issue for the 09/12/2013, I have made 3 calls to the claim line to inform them what happened and yes there is a claim which was not my fault being addressed. I am at this time waiting for someone to contract me about this matter as this is what I was told the last time I made a call about it. Could this be looked into also so I know that it is being addressed in the correct way and I am not just waiting for someone to contact me and this does not happen as I would like to get this addressed as soon as possible so that KGM will see this claim was not my fault. I would like to get insured yet for the past days have not been able to do so as I am waiting for information on a quote and also to hear back about what KGM is doing with my 10 years no claims which was protected. I have been with Broadsure for a few years now and have never had any problems with you.

Simon

The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue:

231. Lorraine Cordell _Re_ Simon Cordell Doctors

/ Page Numbers: 542,

From: Lorraine Cordell [lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk]

Sent: 25 February 2014 11:01

To: 'JOSEPHINE WARD'

Subject: RE: Simon Cordell Doctors

Attachments: Meds-from-doctor.pdf

Hi Josey

Simon has just come from the doctors; his doctor is referring him to the hospital and has started him on tablets please see attached. His doctor said if you need a letter then can you write to them.

Lorraine

Si Note:

Disrepair!

I stay calm even when I see the damage to my personal property that the damp is causing and this neglect breaks my heart in knowing that if the Enfield Council and Enfield homes where efficient within their timescales that I would not have to go through such sacrilege of my memorabilia and electrical belongings getting damaged even more than ever necessarily I am not sure what it is more painful to me this all adds to the demotion of my health and the additional average daily routine stress unrightfully!

Time Spent Building;

My mother also continues to work on building my company website for me with others at the Time Start: 09:00 and Time End: 14:00!

Working at Home doing Court Case Defence Work!

I spent time and resources costing expenditure with my mother also building my defence case, against the allegations getting put against me at the Time Start: 12:00 Am and Time End: 06:00 Am!

26/02/2014

Stuck on bail at my Own Home Address again for the Woolwich Crown Court Case!

Building the catalogue with Josh!

Issues with Housing Disrepair!

Working on My Website!

26/02/2014

· Disrepair!

· 1st Curfew!

· The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue:

232. Lorraine Cordell _Re_ Simon Cordell Logbook

/ Page Numbers: 543

Brixton Case / Met Police!

Broadsure Insurance!

· The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue:

233. Lorraine Cordell _Re_ Simon Cordell_ (25)

/ Page Numbers: 544

Broadsure Insurance!

Driving Ban (1)/?

· The Doctor’s Folder / pub Book Issue: 1!

From: JJRI S WARREN

DRJTHOMAS

DRD ABIDOYE

NIGHTINGALE HOUSE SURGERY

Thank you for seeing this 33-year-old Afro-Caribbean man.

Page Numbers: 9

Gazebo Case!

Doctors!

The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue:

232. Lorraine Cordell _Re_ Simon Cordell Logbook

/ Page Numbers: 543,

From: Lorraine Cordell [lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk]

Sent: 26 March 2014 17:54

To: 'martinjenkin@broadsuredirect.com'

Subject: RE: Simon Cordell Logbook

Hi Martin

Is it all possible to get an update I am losing money due to not having insurance and not being able to drive? You said you would get back to me today and I have not heard anything.

Simon

From: Lorraine Cordell [Mail To:lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk]

Sent: 25 March 2014 11:40

To: 'Martin Jenkin'

Subject: RE: Simon Cordell Logbook

Dear Martin

15/02/2014

as the green slip section 10 was sent to them, so the date of the

10/11/2013

09 Dec 2013

we still have not heard from KGM as to when someone will be sent out to take a report from Simon could this be looked into?

And also, I know there was some confusion as to the number that was called to report this on the

09 Dec 2013

please see the below information from my phone bill Mon

09 Dec

13:28 SPEC SERV 08444126412 22:00

The call was made to 08444126412 at 13:28 and lasted 22 min this is when Simon called to report what had happened on the

09/12/2013

and give all the information which the person noted. I know there is some issue as to the lady who witnessed this information being, but it was all given on this call. If it can be possible can someone get the tape for this call and get the information to the witness so KGM can contact her about what she saw and who was at fault.

Lorraine

The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue:

233. Lorraine Cordell _Re_ Simon Cordell_ (25)

/ Page Numbers: 544,

From: Lorraine Cordell [lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk]

Sent: 26 February 2015 22:31

To: 'GL-BrentMCenq@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk

Cc: 'Sharon.Burns@met.pnn.police.uk

CO16Mailbox-.NorthProsecutionFPN@met.pnn.police.uk

Subject: Re: Simon Cordell

Attachments: Simon_Cordell_Appeal_Willesden_Harrow_Crown_Court.pdf;

Found Guilty again

26-01-2015.pdf

Dear Annabel Jereniah

I have just seen the Memorandum of Entry that the Crown Court has sent and on that it says there was a Disqualification until test passed. But when we contacted the court, we were only told about 6 points and a fine for this case and this was also on the letter from the court. If I knew a Disqualification until test passed when I filed my appeal on the

13/02/2015

I would have ticked this be suspended until appeal was heard. Can you please look into this and see if the appeal could include the suspension of the Disqualification until the appeal is heard?

Please see attached document

Simon_ Cordell_ Appeal_ Willesden_ Harrow_ Crown_ Court Found Guilty again

26-01-2015

As you will see the letter Found Guilty again

26-01-2015

does not show any disqualification and this was confirmed by the court when we called that there were 6 points added and a fine.

Regards Lorraine Cordell

The Doctor’s Folder / pub Book Issue: 1!

From: JJRI S WARREN

DRJTHOMAS

DRD ABIDOYE

NIGHTINGALE HOUSE SURGERY

Thank you for seeing this 33-year-old Afro-Caribbean man.

Page Numbers: 9

28/02/2014 10:00 02688059994

NIGTINGALE SURGERY

page 02/03

JJRI S WARREN DRJTHOMAS DRD ABIDOYE

NIGHTINGALE HOUSE SURGERY 1-3 NIGHTINGALE ROAD EDMONTON

LONDON N9 BAI Tel: 0208 805 9997 Fax: 0208805

www.nightingalehousesurgery.nhs.uk

26 February 2014

DA/KM/12444

PRIVATE & CONFIDENTIAL

Consultant Psychiatrist Enfield Mental Health Triage Team

Chase Farm Hospital URGENT

Dear Doctor

Re: Mr. Simon Cordell DOB: 26-Jan,.1981 NHS No: 434 0961671

109 Burncroft Avenue, Enfield. Middlesex. EN3 7JQ Tel No: 07961833021

Thank you for seeing this 33-year-old Afro-Caribbean man. He gives a history of symptoms of anxiety and depression, which have been on-going for a few months. His symptoms have progressively got worse and he has been having some suicidal thoughts, although he has not made any concrete plans to do anything. He says that the only reason he has not acted on these suicidal thoughts is because of his ex- patient and family. He is currently involved with the criminal justice system and is -currently - on probation. He is under curfew and there have been imposed- restrictions on his movements. He says he is finding it very difficult to cope with the conditions of his - sentence, mainly the confinement to his home. He says that his relationship with is partner appears to have broken down because of what he describes as the tough - conditions of his probation. He continues to feel very low and anxious when he is confined- to his home. - He is having difficulty sleeping. He has had problems with depression in the past and was referred to the psychiatric services in 2012. He has agreed to commence anti-depressant medication today in the form of Sertraline 50mg once daily. He requested some sleeping tablets and I have given him 10 tablets! of Zopiclone 3.75mg 1-2 tabs nocte to be used Infrequently.

Disrepair!

The HHSRS and the housing Act 1985 inclusive of many other rights of mine and many other people’s rights mean that these problems of disrepair must not get left by the Enfield Council and the Enfield Homes teams to carry on the way is does as it is causing me to have no enjoyment out of my flat and emotional distress!

Si Note:

Time Spent Building;

My mother also continues to work on building my company website for me with others at the Time Start: 09:00 and Time End: 14:00!

Working at Home doing Court Case Defence Work!

I spent time and resources costing expenditure with my mother also building my defence case, against the allegations getting put against me at the Time Start: 12:00 Am and Time End: 06:00 Am!

27/02/2014

Stuck on bail at my Own Home Address again for the Woolwich Crown Court Case!

Building the catalogue with Josh!

Issues with Housing Disrepair!

Working on My Website!

27/02/2014

· Disrepair!

· 1st Curfew!

Disrepair!

The Enfield Homes and the Enfield Council have got lots of early resolution to fix the disrepair issues contained within my flat and agree to act with action when repairing the problems but their staff not following the company’s stationery duties of care towards my person leaves me in a worse condition!

Time Spent Building;

My mother also continues to work on building my company website for me with others at the Time Start: 09:00 and Time End: 14:00!

Working at Home doing Court Case Defence Work!

I spent time and resources costing expenditure with my mother also building my defence case, against the allegations getting put against me at the Time Start: 12:00 Am and Time End: 06:00 Am!

28/02/2014

Stuck on bail at my Own Home Address again for the Woolwich Crown Court Case!

Building the catalogue with Josh!

Issues with Housing Disrepair!

Working on My Website!

With Partner Two!

28/02/2014

· Disrepair!

· 1st Curfew!

· The Doctor’s Folder / pub Book Issue: 1!

Receipt

JJRI S WARREN

DRJTHOMAS

DRD ABIDOYE

NIGHTINGALE HOUSE SURGERY

Page Numbers: 11

Doctors!

· The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue:

234. Josephine Ward _Re_ Regina v_ (9) /

Page Numbers: 545

Gazebo Case!

· The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue:

235. Lorraine Cordell _Re_ Unit 3 – 4 Horrisons Industrial Estate, Haymerle Road, SE15 /

Page Numbers: 546

Gazebo Case!

· The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue:

236. Lorraine Cordell _Re_ Regina v_ (24) /

Page Numbers: 547

· The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue:

237. Lorraine Cordell _Re_ Update for Simon case /

Page Numbers: 548

Gazebo Case!

The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue:

234. Josephine Ward _Re_ Regina v_ (9)

/ Page Numbers: 545,

From: Josephine Ward [josephinewardsolicitor@gmail.com]

Sent: 28 February 2014 17:13

To: Lorraine Cordell

Subject: RE: Regina v. Simon Cordell

Hi Lorraine

Nothing from CPS so will be asking for case to be listed on Tuesday. I sent you what I received from the insurance company. Three claims. Have forwarded to CPS and court and stated we are entitled to earlier crime reports etc. Have a nice weekend

Regards

Josephine

From: Lorraine Cordell

Sent: 28/02/2014 15:39

To: 'JOSEPHINE WARD'

Subject: RE: Regina v. Simon Cordell

Hi Josey

Has there been any update from the crown as of yet?

Simon is really not good and I am getting more and more worried about him.

Lorraine

The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue:

235. Lorraine Cordell _Re_ Unit 3 – 4 Horrisons Industrial Estate, Haymerle Road, SE15

/ Page Numbers: 546,

From: Lorraine Cordell [lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk]

Sent: 28 February 2014 12:22

To: 'accessinfo@southwark.gov.uk'

Subject: RE: Unit 3 - 4 Horrisons Industrial Estate, Haymerle Road, SE15

MR. Simon Paul Cordell

109 Burncroft Road

Enfield

Middlesex

EN3 7JQ

18/02/2014

To Whom It May Concern: Noise and Nuisance Team I am writing this email under the Freedom of information Act. The dates of information I am asking for is for the

16/02/2013

17/02/2013

Also

04/05/2013

05/05/2013

At Unit 3 - 4 Horrisons Industrial Estate, Haymerle Road, SE15. I am asking for all calls made on these dates by any person due to noise at the above address including any noise abatement orders that where put in place for this address. Person’s names who attended the address and times of any person attending from the Noise and Nuisance Team. Also, ID. any police on these dates with names of police officers that where involved with the said noise at this address and times that any people had to attend the address from the Noise and Nuisance Team. Any reports made up for this address in full for the dates listed above. If there is a cost for this information, then can you please update of the cost via email. Also, if there is any information that cannot be given can you also please update me as to what information is being withheld?

Yours faithfully

Mr Simon Paul Cordell

From: Lorraine Cordell [lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk]

Sent: 28 February 2014 12:22

To: 'accessinfo@southwark.gov.uk'

Subject: RE: Unit 3 - 4 Horrisons Industrial Estate, Haymerle Road, SE15

MR. Simon Paul Cordell

109 Burncroft Road

Enfield

Middlesex

EN3 7JQ

18/02/2014

To Whom It May Concern: Noise and Nuisance Team I am writing this email under the Freedom of information Act. The dates of information I am asking for is for the

16/02/2013

17/02/2013,

Also

04/05/2013

05/05/2013

At Unit 3 - 4 Horrisons Industrial Estate, Haymerle Road, SE15. I am asking for all calls made on these dates by any person due to noise at the above address including any noise abatement orders that where put in place for this address. Person’s names who attended the address and times of any person attending from the Noise and Nuisance Team. Also, if any police on these dates with names of police officers that where involved with the said noise at this address and times that any people had to attend the address from the Noise and Nuisance Team. Any reports made up for this address in full for the dates listed above. If there is a cost for this information, then can you please update of the cost via email. Also, if there is any information that cannot be given can you also please update me as to what information is being withheld?

Yours faithfully

Mr Simon Paul Cordell

The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue:

236. Lorraine Cordell _Re_ Regina v_ (24)

/ Page Numbers: 547,

From: Lorraine Cordell [lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk]

Sent: 28 February 2014 15:40

To: 'JOSEPHINE WARD'

Subject: RE: Regina v. Simon Cordell

Hi Josey

Has there been any update from the crown as of yet?

Simon is really not good, and I am getting more and more worried about him.

Lorraine

The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue:

237. Lorraine Cordell _Re_ Update for Simon case

/ Page Numbers: 548,

From: Lorraine Cordell [lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk]

Sent: 28 April 2014 17:54

To: 'JOSEPHINE WARD'

Subject: RE: Update for Simon case

Hi Josey

Can you let me know if when Simon case will be listed as we have not heard anything?

Has the CPS sent anything else over if not we were thinking the pressure needs to be kept on the police and CPS for the discloser so was thinking it would have been better to have gone back to court by now so the judge can see what’s going on?

I know the CPS asked for more time and said they would have the information over to you by the end of business day on the

14/04/2014

this did not happen and again they asked for more time which has again passed and they have not given the information over, is the judge going to be made aware of this as they had enough time already to give over the information that was asked for. They have now not done what the judge asked 4 times, and you have also given them 2 more extensions and still nothing. And I do think the judge needs to be made aware of this fact. Can we have an update as to what is going on, I know when I last talked to you on the

24/04/2014

you said you was going to put into the court on the

29/04/2014

so, I was thinking it should have already been listed for yesterday or today but have not heard anything.

Lorraine

The Doctor’s Folder / pub Book Issue: 1!

Receipt

JJRI S WARREN

DRJTHOMAS

DRD ABIDOYE

NIGHTINGALE HOUSE SURGERY

Page Numbers: 11

28/02/2014

10:00

02088059994

NIGTINGALE SURGERY

PAGE 01/03

NIGHTINGALE HOUSE SURGERY 1-3 NIGHTINGALE ROAD EDMONTON N9 8AJ

TEL NO: 02088059997

FAX NO 0208 8059994 WWW nightingalehousesuigery.nhs.uk

FACSIMILE TRANSMISSION HEADER SHEET

TO: Mental Health

FOR ATTENTION OF:

FROM: Dr. Abidoye

PACEs No: 1 of 3

DATE: 28/02/2014

TIME: 10AM

MESS^GEMDDITIONAL COMMENTS

Dr. Johnathan S. Warren Dr. Jade l Thomas Dr. Depo Abidoye

Si Note:

Disrepair!

A full investigation is supposed to have taken place within the first stages of my complaints once the Enfield Councils and the Enfield Homes got put in receipt of the emergency issues but did not persist to be established in a fair and equal manner that took my safety and health into account due to the disrepair matters!

Time Spent Building;

My mother also continues to work on building my company website for me with others at the Time Start: 09:00 and Time End: 14:00!

Working at Home doing Court Case Defence Work!

I spent time and resources costing expenditure with my mother also building my defence case, against the allegations getting put against me at the Time Start: 12:00 Am and Time End: 06:00 Am!

In Diary

Headers = Yes

Main = Yes yy